2017
DOI: 10.1289/ehp1742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Incidence of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer in 15 European Cohorts within the ESCAPE Project

Abstract: Background:Epidemiological evidence on the association between ambient air pollution and breast cancer risk is inconsistent.Objective:We examined the association between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and incidence of postmenopausal breast cancer in European women.Methods:In 15 cohorts from nine European countries, individual estimates of air pollution levels at the residence were estimated by standardized land-use regression models developed within the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
119
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
119
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although three case–control studies observed positive associations with exposure to PM 2.5 or NO 2 , our results are similar to several other recent cohort studies which found limited evidence linking incident breast cancer to PM 2.5 or NO 2. For example, no association with PM 2.5 was observed in the Danish Nurse Cohort Study (HR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94–1.10 per IQR of 3.3 μg/m 3 ; 1,145 cases) and in the US Sister Study (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96–1.11 per IQR of 3.6 μg/m 3 ; 1,749 cases) . In addition, the European Study of Cohorts of Air pollution Effects reported no association between incident breast cancer and exposure to NO 2 with a HR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98–1.07 per 10 μg/m 3 ; 3,612 cases) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although three case–control studies observed positive associations with exposure to PM 2.5 or NO 2 , our results are similar to several other recent cohort studies which found limited evidence linking incident breast cancer to PM 2.5 or NO 2. For example, no association with PM 2.5 was observed in the Danish Nurse Cohort Study (HR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94–1.10 per IQR of 3.3 μg/m 3 ; 1,145 cases) and in the US Sister Study (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96–1.11 per IQR of 3.6 μg/m 3 ; 1,749 cases) . In addition, the European Study of Cohorts of Air pollution Effects reported no association between incident breast cancer and exposure to NO 2 with a HR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98–1.07 per 10 μg/m 3 ; 3,612 cases) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… For example, no association with PM 2.5 was observed in the Danish Nurse Cohort Study (HR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94–1.10 per IQR of 3.3 μg/m 3 ; 1,145 cases) and in the US Sister Study (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96–1.11 per IQR of 3.6 μg/m 3 ; 1,749 cases) . In addition, the European Study of Cohorts of Air pollution Effects reported no association between incident breast cancer and exposure to NO 2 with a HR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98–1.07 per 10 μg/m 3 ; 3,612 cases) . The lack of association observed in our study and in these previous cohort studies might be attributable to the absence of data on early‐life air pollution exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The well‐established risk factors for breast cancer related to hormone and reproduction or obesity account for only a minority of the diagnoses . Exposures to environmental chemicals such as PCBs, organochlorine pesticides, dioxins, PAHs, organic solvents or air pollutants are also suspected to account for part of the breast cancer incidence . Some of these chemicals such as PAHs, aryl amines, and N‐nitrosamines are metabolized and activated in mammary gland cells and may induce mammary tumors in experimental animals .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental air pollution -including exposure to polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), which may be correlated with traffic noise (24) -has also been suggested as a risk factor for breast cancer (25), though the association is not clear (26). Regardless, attempts to adjust for this obvious potential confounder should also be included in future studies on noise and cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%