LPWAN Technologies for IoT and M2M Applications 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818880-4.00007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term evolution for machines (LTE-M)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LTE Cat-M1 [138] is a LPWAN that enables cellular services for the IoT world. Compared to NB-IoT, this technology provides higher data rate and the ability to use voice over the network, but requires more bandwidth and, therefore, the devices are more complex and expensive.…”
Section: Wireless Standards For Ai-enabled Iot Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LTE Cat-M1 [138] is a LPWAN that enables cellular services for the IoT world. Compared to NB-IoT, this technology provides higher data rate and the ability to use voice over the network, but requires more bandwidth and, therefore, the devices are more complex and expensive.…”
Section: Wireless Standards For Ai-enabled Iot Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LTE-M transmissions are limited to a narrowband size of 6 PRBs correspondings to 1.4 MHz including guardbands [3]. As the LTE system has a bandwidth from 1.4 to 20 MHz, some non-overlapping narrowbands (NBs) can be used if the LTE bandwidth exceeds 1.4 MHz [20]. Up to Rel-14, LTE-M device uses QPSK and 16-QAM modulation schemes with a single antenna for both downlink and uplink.…”
Section: Lte-machine (Type Communication): Lte-m(tc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to Rel-14, LTE-M device uses QPSK and 16-QAM modulation schemes with a single antenna for both downlink and uplink. Whereas the support of 64-QAM in downlink has been introduced in Rel-15 [20].…”
Section: Lte-machine (Type Communication): Lte-m(tc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, they demand a dedicated radio in addition to the already existing cellular radio in the user equipment (UE). This results in increased hardware overhead and additional cost, which are undesirable, especially for low-cost and low-power MTC and IoT devices [18], [19]. Secondly, without further enhancements, the technologies such as Bluetooth and Wi-Fi-Direct require manual device pairing and repeated user interventions to re-establish connections when disruptions occur [20]- [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%