2014
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/2014/t159/014027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term erosion of plasma-facing materials with different surface roughness in ASDEX Upgrade

Abstract: Abstract. The effect of surface roughness on the long-term erosion patterns of tungsten coatings was investigated in the outer strike-point region of ASDEX Upgrade during its 2010/11 plasma operations. The net erosion rates of rough coatings (R a = 5-6 m) were 3-7 times smaller than those of smooth coatings (R a = 0.4-0.8 m). This is because rough surfaces are largely modified and damaged in the microscopic scale but the material is re-deposited together with boron, deuterium, and carbon on the shadowed sides … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest deposition is measured on the pre-damaged samples with a large effective surface area while on the smooth bulk W and Mo samples deposition outside the PFR is almost non-existent. This is in line with the conclusions made in [17,18] on rough surfaces favouring accumulation of material in shadowed valleys behind protruding surface peaks. For tungsten, however, the deposition peak in the PFR is almost independent of the surface roughness but relatively rough marker samples and smooth bulk Mo samples indicate net deposition being comparable (FIG.…”
Section: P6-349supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The strongest deposition is measured on the pre-damaged samples with a large effective surface area while on the smooth bulk W and Mo samples deposition outside the PFR is almost non-existent. This is in line with the conclusions made in [17,18] on rough surfaces favouring accumulation of material in shadowed valleys behind protruding surface peaks. For tungsten, however, the deposition peak in the PFR is almost independent of the surface roughness but relatively rough marker samples and smooth bulk Mo samples indicate net deposition being comparable (FIG.…”
Section: P6-349supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effect of surface roughness on the longterm erosion patterns of tungsten coatings was investigated in the outer strike-point region of ASDEX Upgrade during the 2010/11 campaign. A total of ∼6000 s of plasma operation was analyzed [268]. When the surface roughness was R 1.5 a = μm, the net erosion rate was 0.03 nm s −1 .…”
Section: Erosion-migration-depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above results, the lower mass loss of PoMa-W f /W samples compared with the theoretical value can be referred to the re-deposition effect due to high surface roughness of the matrix. As sketched in figure 6, when the surface roughness is high, the particles being sputtered away can be re-trapped by the surface bumps with much higher probability, as it has been reported in [38,39]. Additionally, according to the less mass loss of PoMa-W f /W, together with the SEM observation, the loose matrix structure does not cause the shedding of W particles under plasma erosion.…”
Section: Plasma Erosionmentioning
confidence: 61%