2008
DOI: 10.3233/nre-2008-23203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of prism adaptation on chronic neglect after stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects of prism adaptation have been reported across clinical measures of neglect, but also in more daily situations, such as wheelchair navigation (Rossetti et al, 1999) and postural control (Tilikete et al, 2001). The beneficial effects of prism adaptation have been reported to last 2 h (Rossetti et al, 1998) up to one week (Dijkerman et al, 2004;Pisella et al, 2002) after a single adaptation session, and even up to 6 weeks following repetitive prism adaptation (Shiraishi et al, 2008;McIntosh et al, 2002). Additionally, long-term prism training has been reported to show long-lasting beneficial effects, from weeks (Frassinetti et al, 2002;Serino et al, 2006;Serino et al, 2009;Serino et al, 2007) up to a year (Humphreys et al, 2006) after ending adaptation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of prism adaptation have been reported across clinical measures of neglect, but also in more daily situations, such as wheelchair navigation (Rossetti et al, 1999) and postural control (Tilikete et al, 2001). The beneficial effects of prism adaptation have been reported to last 2 h (Rossetti et al, 1998) up to one week (Dijkerman et al, 2004;Pisella et al, 2002) after a single adaptation session, and even up to 6 weeks following repetitive prism adaptation (Shiraishi et al, 2008;McIntosh et al, 2002). Additionally, long-term prism training has been reported to show long-lasting beneficial effects, from weeks (Frassinetti et al, 2002;Serino et al, 2006;Serino et al, 2009;Serino et al, 2007) up to a year (Humphreys et al, 2006) after ending adaptation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, no pain reduction was observed when a CRPS patient underwent 2 weeks of PA using lenses that shifted the visual image only by 5° [24]. Furthermore, prisms strength of 10°-15°was found to be sufficient to induce lasting amelioration of hemispatial neglect after brain injury [14,17,18,36,37], whereas weaker prisms did not improve neglect [38]. During each treatment session, the participant is seated in front of a vertical surface, such as a wall, upon which an A4 laminated page in landscape orientation is positioned.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The procedure is adapted from a previous study [56] in which pairs of numbers were read aloud to the participants and they were required to indicate the number that would fall midway between the two without making any calculations. The current task uses the same intervals (9,16,25,36,49 For example, the midpoint number between 54 and 70 (16-interval) would be 62 (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Mental Representation Of Space the Mental Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was confirmed in a seminal study showing behavioral improvements that lasted over two hours after a single session [46], longer than any other intervention for neglect to date. Since then numerous studies have demonstrated that after multiple rounds of prism adaptation effects may last for weeks [47][48][49] or months [50,51]. The intervention is effective even in chronic stroke [48,[52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then numerous studies have demonstrated that after multiple rounds of prism adaptation effects may last for weeks [47][48][49] or months [50,51]. The intervention is effective even in chronic stroke [48,[52][53][54][55]. Effects are manifest well beyond visuomotor performance to visual imagery [56,57], visuo-verbal tasks [58], bisection of a mental number line [59], body representation [60] and other aspects of cognition [43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%