2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term clinical observation of the immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we predict the two-dose schedule will follow the same trend as the three-dose study and immunogenicity will persist at similar levels until at least 17 years. Two previous studies on the long-term immunogenicity of hepatitis A vaccine using the 2 dose schedule in children and adolescence have shown excellent long-term immunogenicity at 10 years [8,10]. Another study compared a two-and three-dose schedule using a combination hepatitis A and B vaccine with the same amount of antigen as in our study and demonstrated good immunogenicity at 10 years and the vaccination schedules elicit immune responses that are not statistically different [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we predict the two-dose schedule will follow the same trend as the three-dose study and immunogenicity will persist at similar levels until at least 17 years. Two previous studies on the long-term immunogenicity of hepatitis A vaccine using the 2 dose schedule in children and adolescence have shown excellent long-term immunogenicity at 10 years [8,10]. Another study compared a two-and three-dose schedule using a combination hepatitis A and B vaccine with the same amount of antigen as in our study and demonstrated good immunogenicity at 10 years and the vaccination schedules elicit immune responses that are not statistically different [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Others have reported the long term clinical results of the two-dose vaccination schedule in other geographical areas [8][9][10], herein we compare two-dose vaccination to the three-dose vaccination which is the longest followed cohort for HAV immunization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there is no consensus regarding anti-HAV seroprotective levels. We arbitrarily used the threshold of 20 IU/L as a proxy for seroprotection for anti-HAV [23][24][25] and defined a priori for all study vaccines an anamnestic response as a ≥ 4-fold rise in antibody level. For subjects with anti-HBs titers under 10 IU/L, a level above this threshold was also required to be considered as an anamnestic response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Similarly, the anti-HAV GMTs in both study groups were more than 100-fold higher than the antibody titers cited in several publications as seroprotective. [23][24][25] Thus, the differences in anti-HAV and anti-HBs GMTs observed one month post-second dose of vaccine should have no clinical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we do not know how far the immunity induced by immunization persists, though several studies reported recently that the vaccine induced immunity last as long as vaccines have been available [19][20][21][22]. Therefore, the heterogeneous endemicity over the country [17,18] raised a serious concern of HAV infection, that is, if immunity induced by vaccination decreases when immunized children become adults, the disease burden from hepatitis A will paradoxically increase, because relatively high levels of circulating hepatitis A virus persist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%