2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term clinical course and outcome of schizophrenia in rural Ethiopia: 10-year follow-up of a population-based cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, previous studies not included in this review have reported that females had better clinical and functional recovery outcomes (Albert et al, ; Chang et al, ; Shibre et al, ; Verma, Subramaniam, Abdin, Poon, & Chong, ). However, studies included in this review did not reveal such gender difference in subjective recovery status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, previous studies not included in this review have reported that females had better clinical and functional recovery outcomes (Albert et al, ; Chang et al, ; Shibre et al, ; Verma, Subramaniam, Abdin, Poon, & Chong, ). However, studies included in this review did not reveal such gender difference in subjective recovery status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Studies that measured the spectra directly found that psychoticism and detachment are impressively stable over time, with 10‐year stability correlations of .66 and .82, respectively 272 . Moreover, psychoticism, trait detachment, and especially negative symptoms are associated with poor functioning and predict worse global outcomes even ten years later 41,273‐275 . Positive symptoms appear to predict worse functioning in the general population 260 , but not in patients with psychotic disorders, where negative symptoms account for impairment 276 .…”
Section: Validity Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of good quality care is associated with a high level of physical, emotional, economic and social suffering and disability [15, 16], excess mortality [17] and experience of physical restraint or other forms of deprivations of liberty, discrimination and abuse [18]. There is no mental health legislation to protect the rights of people with mental health problems [19] and there is limited representation for service users at the national level, with just one active advocacy group led by caregivers of people with mental health problems [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%