2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1352-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural African setting: qualitative study

Abstract: BackgroundIt is essential to involve service users in efforts to expand access to mental health care in integrated primary care settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is little evidence from LMICs to guide this process. The aim of this study was to explore barriers to, and facilitators of, service user/caregiver involvement in rural Ethiopia to inform the development of a scalable approach.MethodsThirty nine semi-structured interviews were carried out with purposively selected men… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 Despite the ubiquity of involvement rhetoric within policy and practice ideologies across the world, current evidence suggests implementation remains far from optimal and service user and carer isolation and dissatisfaction persist. 10,[19][20][21][22][23][24] In a recent commentary, it was argued that true collaboration between people with mental health diagnoses and researchers, policy makers and health professionals cannot happen in environments which continue to perpetuate hierarchies and power imbalances albeit in a less transparent form. 25 Often such imbalances are sustained by macro-level factors such as the legacy of prior mental health policy and historical practice, legal frameworks and organizational cultures often not targeted or considered by PPI interventions.…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Despite the ubiquity of involvement rhetoric within policy and practice ideologies across the world, current evidence suggests implementation remains far from optimal and service user and carer isolation and dissatisfaction persist. 10,[19][20][21][22][23][24] In a recent commentary, it was argued that true collaboration between people with mental health diagnoses and researchers, policy makers and health professionals cannot happen in environments which continue to perpetuate hierarchies and power imbalances albeit in a less transparent form. 25 Often such imbalances are sustained by macro-level factors such as the legacy of prior mental health policy and historical practice, legal frameworks and organizational cultures often not targeted or considered by PPI interventions.…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important contributing factor to mental health issues in LMICs is the discrimination against people with mental illnesses. They are labelled, exempted and even abused [23]. Although 70% of people affected by mental illness experience stigma and discrimination in the UK, this is even higher in LMICs where awareness of mental illness is low [24].…”
Section: Widespread Discrimination and Stigma Against Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent situational analyses have been published from Emerald project countries describing the system and clinical level characteristics and resources for integrating mental health care into primary care in the study sites (Semrau et al 2015;Abayneh et al 2017;Mugisha et al 2017), while service users' and caregivers' involvement in mental health strengthening are reported by Semrau et al in this edition, and in the web appendices to this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%