2022
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term changes in habitat selection and prey spectrum in a reintroduced Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in Switzerland

Abstract: When wild‐caught Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) from the Slovak Carpathian Mountains were reintroduced to Central Switzerland in the early 1970s and spread through the north‐western Swiss Alps (NWA), they faced a largely unfamiliar landscape with strongly fragmented forests, high elevations, and intense human land use. For more than 30 years, radio‐collared lynx have been monitored during three different project periods (in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2010s). Our study explored, how lynx over generations have learned to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While VHF data (225/442 remaining individuals) offered lower positional accuracy compared to GPS data (location errors up to ca. 500 m; Nagl et al., 2022; White et al., 2015), we included them to improve the representativity of our datasets for characterizing site‐ and continental‐scale habitat selection by lynx.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While VHF data (225/442 remaining individuals) offered lower positional accuracy compared to GPS data (location errors up to ca. 500 m; Nagl et al., 2022; White et al., 2015), we included them to improve the representativity of our datasets for characterizing site‐ and continental‐scale habitat selection by lynx.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we wanted to make probability of use predictions for 2 of our analyses (objectives 2, 3) and check that our models were not overfit, we ensured that each of the top models (ΔAIC c ≤ 2) from the 3 analyses had high predictive power and performed well on both training and test datasets before model averaging as indicated by a moderately high Spearman rank correlation coefficient ( r s ≥ 0.6; Boyce et al 2002). We performed a 5‐fold cross validation where we withheld 20% of the data in each fold using the function kfoldRSF () in the package IndRSA (Boyce et al 2002, Bastille‐Rousseau and Wittemyer 2019, Bastille‐Rousseau et al 2020, Nagl et al 2022). Each of the 4 female top models from objective 2 and the 2 male top models from objective 3 performed well at predicting woodcock habitat selection so we continued with model averaging of coefficient estimates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%