Long-Term Athletic Development, Part 2

Lloyd, Rhodri S.; Oliver, Jon L.; Faigenbaum, Avery D.; Howard, Rick; Croix, Mark B. A. De Ste; Williams, Craig A.; Best, Thomas M.; Alvar, Brent A.; Micheli, Lyle J.; Thomas, D. Phillip; Hatfield, Disa L.; Cronin, John; Myer, Gregory D.

doi:10.1519/01.jsc.0000465424.75389.56

Cited by 88 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 114 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The improvement may be partially due to the rise in muscle temperature [26]. Our findings are in line with programs which develop movement competency in young children, which is essential for the youth physical development model [27].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Short-Term FIFA 11+ Improves Agility and Jump Performance in Young Soccer Players

Trajković

Gušić

Molnár

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies dealing with the effectiveness of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 11+ prevention program to improve performance outcomes in children aged < 14 years are limited. This study aimed to point out the effects of the application of short-term FIFA 11+ warm-up program on physical performance in young football players. Participants were 36 youth male football players, divided into a FIFA 11+ (n = 19; mean (SD) age: 11.15 (0.79) y) and a control group (CG: n = 17; age: 10.87 (0.8) y) and trained for 4 weeks. Before and after the training period, standing long jump performance, agility, repeated sprint ability, sit and reach, and "30-15" intermittent fitness tests were assessed. A mixed ANOVA showed significant differences between the groups in the standing long jump test (FIFA 11+: 5.6% vs. CG: −1.9%) in favor of FIFA 11+ over CG. Additionally, the FIFA 11+ performance of the Illinois agility test was significantly better compared to the CG performance (FIFA 11+: −1.9% vs. CG: 0.03%). The main findings of this study suggest that just 4 weeks of implementation of the FIFA 11+ improves physical performance compared with traditional warm-up routines in young soccer players.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Short-Term FIFA 11+ Improves Agility and Jump Performance in Young Soccer Players

Trajković

Gušić

Molnár

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since its conception, subsequent athletic development models focused on physical fitness have aligned themselves with the DMSP's stages of participation 8,9 , as has a more recent version of the YPD 13 . Furthermore, several position statements and studies support DMSP's sampling approach to help prevent burnout and overuse injuries in youth 1,[14][15][16][17] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent literature has questioned the suitability of the term "athlete" when delineating constructs surrounding the athletic development of youth 1 . Some argue that the term "athlete" in the long-term athlete development model renders the structure as a means to solely developing athletes 13 ; however, in light of the global numbers of obese/overweight and physically illiterate children, LTAD should really be an initiative for all youth. Although originally presented as a participation model, the Balyi and Hamilton 3 model promotes high volumes of conditioning and training around adolescence, particularly through the 10,000 hour rule; however, the suitability of this approach has been questioned in the literature 22,23 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating models of long-term athletic development to maximize the physical development of youth

Pichardo

Oliver

Harrison

et al. 2018

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Long-term athletic development is important to prepare youth for sport and an active lifestyle. Several models have provided general frameworks for long-term athletic development from different perspectives that consider factors such as when to sample and specialize and what physical qualities to train and when. More recently, more specific models of long-term athletic development have emerged that focus on both specific modes of training and specific fitness qualities. This includes models focused on the development of speed, agility, power, and endurance as well as models devoted to resistance training, plyometric training, and weightlifting. These models incorporate factors such as technical competency, developmental stage, maturation, and training age to describe the long-term progression of athletic development. A challenge for the coach is to understand how these models inform one another and how they integrate into practice to allow the use of multiple modes of training to develop multiple components of fitness simultaneously throughout childhood and adolescence. This review will examine how information from various models can be integrated to maximize the physical long-term athletic development of youth.

show abstract

“…The importance of the FMS phase in motor development models is also highlighted in the 'mountain model' [12] and 'clock hourglass model.' [13] Clearly, from these viewpoints and experiences with children aged 6-18 years, [14,15], teaching FMS seems to be a significant foundation for motor development and physical activity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In other words, at different periods of ontogeny or advantages of individual development， we may place much emphasis on developing one or a few aspects , meanwhile complementing and promoting each other.Lloyd and Oliver[46] provided a logical and physiological evidence-based "Youth Physical Development Model" (YPD), which showed that both FMS, physical ability(strength, agility, speed, etc.) and sport-specific skills are trainable at all times throughout childhood and adolescence (from age 2 to 21), but the emphasis placed on each component varies according to individual maturation[15].On the basis of such major findings and results,…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Motor Fitness, Fundamental Movement Skills, and Functional Movement Screen in Primary School Children

Eungpinichpong

Ruan

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates motor fitness (MF), fundamental movement skills (FMS), and functional movement screen (FMS™) in 7-10-year-old children, and evaluates the relationship between FMS?MF and FMS™ combination with Seefeldt`s model for empirical research, thus to present effective strategies of physical development in children. A class was randomly selected in four school grades (1-4) along with 30 students from each to take the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2). A total of 117 children (42 girls, aged 7-10) participated in three tests: TGMD-2, MF tests, and FMS™. MF levels (good, fair, and poor) and FMS™ levels (high, moderate, and low) were classified according to specific percentile ranges. A multiple (R×C) chi-square test analysis of the relationship between MF, FMS, and FMS™ was applied and post hoc testing estimated the possibility of FMS and FMS™ predicting MF. The results showed that only 43% of children were rated “good” on MF. Most fourth-grade students exhibited a certain gap with mature FMS (TGMD-2 score 70.13±9.68< 96 full scores). Boys scored significantly higher on the object control subtest and the TGMD-2 total score compared to girls (p<0.001), while girls had a significantly greater score than boys on the FMS™ ( p =0.001). The results of multiple chi-square demonstrated FMS to be weakly correlated with MF, χ 2 (4,N=117) =14.605, p =0.006< 0.01, Cramer’s V = 0.25. Both 60.5% of “excellent” FMS and 59.6% of “high” FMS™ children were categorized as having a “good” MF level. On the other hand, only 23.1% of the “worst” FMS and 24.3% of “low” FMS™ individuals were classified as having a “good” MF level. Our results suggest that MF, FMS, FMS™ are relatively independent systems linking with each other, generating mutual interaction in children’s motor development. At different stages or different advantages of them motor development, we may emphasize training one or a few parts.

show abstract

Long-Term Athletic Development, Part 2

Cited by 88 publications

References 114 publications

Short-Term FIFA 11+ Improves Agility and Jump Performance in Young Soccer Players

Short-Term FIFA 11+ Improves Agility and Jump Performance in Young Soccer Players

Integrating models of long-term athletic development to maximize the physical development of youth

The Relationship Between Motor Fitness, Fundamental Movement Skills, and Functional Movement Screen in Primary School Children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About