1984
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90111-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term alterations in the maternal behavior of neonatally undernourished rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of significant reductions in body and brain weights concurrent with ear-and-eye-opening delays throughout the study is in line with previous reports showing that different perinatal underfeeding paradigms consistently interfere with food intake, physical growth, low emission of vocalizations and poor maternal care and delayed sensory maturation, particularly in the olfactory channel when the mother-litter bonds are at a critical stage and are essential for the pups' survival and brain growth (Salas et al 1970, Math and Davrainville 1980, Salas et al 1984, Almli et al 1985, Alberts and Cramer 1988, Diaz-Cintra et al 1994, Fleming et al 1999, Torrero et al 2000, Tonkiss et al 2003, Rubio et al 2004). …”
Section: Physical Developmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding of significant reductions in body and brain weights concurrent with ear-and-eye-opening delays throughout the study is in line with previous reports showing that different perinatal underfeeding paradigms consistently interfere with food intake, physical growth, low emission of vocalizations and poor maternal care and delayed sensory maturation, particularly in the olfactory channel when the mother-litter bonds are at a critical stage and are essential for the pups' survival and brain growth (Salas et al 1970, Math and Davrainville 1980, Salas et al 1984, Almli et al 1985, Alberts and Cramer 1988, Diaz-Cintra et al 1994, Fleming et al 1999, Torrero et al 2000, Tonkiss et al 2003, Rubio et al 2004). …”
Section: Physical Developmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One possibility to explain the current results concerns the role of the OB olfactory input alterations associated with the underfeeding paradigm used here. In fact, it is known that this or similar food restriction procedures negatively influence the mother-litter bonds, thus affecting the cytoarchitectonic organization and functional OB maturation (Math and Davrainville 1980, Galler and Propert 1982, Salas et al 1984, Almli et al 1985, Regalado et al 1999, Torrero et al 2000. Thus, our experimental findings are supported by the abundant evidence of environmental influences on the morphology of the OB during development and even in adulthood (Meisami and Safari 1981, Brunjes and 1986, Panhuber and Laing 1987, Farbman 1990, Colín-Barenque et al 1999.…”
Section: Effects Of Undernourishment In the Ob Area And Ogssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Intrauterine malnutrition and hypoxia also have long-term effects on brain cell number and cell size, probably via alteration in fetal mitotic rate (Meberg, 1981). Daily mother ± litter separation, which involves both dietary and sensory deprivation, results in long-term alterations in the maternal behaviour of the neonatally undernourished rats (Salas et al 1984). This indicates that environmental in¯uences related to food intake and sensory stimulation, interacting at critical stages of brain development, are essential for the maturation of adult behavioural patterns.…”
Section: Impact Of Maternal and Perinatal Undernutrition On Neuroanatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long term effects on behavior however have shown to be selective to specific behavioral patterns, confirming the robustness of certain behaviors that remain spared to the insult. Consistent long term alterations 414 observed in malnourished rats are an intense emotional response (Levitsky & Barnes, 1970;Halas et al, 1980), distorted affiliation and social behavior (Peters, 1978;Whatson et al, 1976), enhanced locomotor activity (Almeida et al, 1993), poor performance in spatial learning tasks (Goodlett et al, 1986;Castro & Rudy, 1987;Tonkiss et al, 1990), and deficient maternal-pup interaction (Franková;Salas et al, 1984). In contrast, no long term differences between malnourished rats and their controls have been found in the open field and latent learning (Mello et al, 1989), in spatial memory performance (Campbell & Bedi, 1988), passive avoidance and neuromuscular coordination (Guthrie, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%