2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term (13-year) effects of repeated prescribed fires on stand structure and tree regeneration in mixed-oak forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oak sapling density on the HighF/Recent plots was double that of LowF/Recent plots, 8 times the density of LowF/Nonrecent plots, and 25 times the density of nonfire plots. Our findings support recent studies and reviews highlighting the need for canopy reduction in conjunction with prescribed fire for successful oak regeneration (Iverson et al 2008, Hutchinson et al 2012a, 2012b, Brose et al 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Oak sapling density on the HighF/Recent plots was double that of LowF/Recent plots, 8 times the density of LowF/Nonrecent plots, and 25 times the density of nonfire plots. Our findings support recent studies and reviews highlighting the need for canopy reduction in conjunction with prescribed fire for successful oak regeneration (Iverson et al 2008, Hutchinson et al 2012a, 2012b, Brose et al 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, studies involving multiple prescribed fires in eastern oak forests have also reported mixed results with three or four fires reducing red maple seedling numbers but not improving the competitive position of oak seedlings (Alexander et al 2008, Green et al 2010, two or three fires reducing red maple saplings but also reducing oak sapling numbers and increasing red maple sprouts (Blankenship and Arthur 2006), and the composition of tree regeneration unchanged after two or four prescribed burns (Hutchinson et al 2005). Whereas fire may be key to the development of a sufficient and competitive pool of oak advanced reproduction on mesic sites, the ultimate success may also depend on a fire-free period during which oak stems can grow beyond the sapling-size class (Guyette et al 2006, Dey and Fan 2009, Arthur et al 2012) and a reduction in canopy density to release oak advanced reproduction (Iverson et al 2008, Hutchinson et al 2012a, 2012b, Brose et al 2013.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hutchinson et al. () did find that oak‐hickory regeneration competed well in natural canopy gaps that formed in stands with a recent history of frequent dormant‐season fires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical tamarack (Larix laricina)-dominated mixed forests were more dense in tree number than current aspen (i.e., Populus tremulides)-dominated mixed forests but aspen forestry may remove less biomass than high severity fires and the landscape remains forested. Conversely, in the Eastern Broadleaf Forest division, open oak savannas and woodlands resulted from frequent surface fires, which reduced stem density of small diameter trees (in any type of forests with a surface fire regime; North et al 2009;Hutchinson et al 2012), and larger diameter trees also developed over time without overstory canopy disturbance. Open forest ecosystems have densified into eastern broadleaf forests after fire exclusion (Hanberry et al 2012a) but forested area has decreased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%