2019
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201900301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐Range Non‐Coulombic Electron–Electron Interactions between LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Nanowires

Abstract: The LaAlO3/SrTiO3 system exhibits unusual magnetic and superconducting behavior arising from electron–electron interactions whose physical origin is not well understood. Quantum transport techniques, especially those involving mesoscopic geometries, can offer insight into these interactions. Here evidence for long‐range electron–electron interactions in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 nanowires, measured through the phenomenon of frictional drag, is reported, in which current passing through one nanowire induces a voltage acros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When two electrical conductors are placed in close proximity, current driven through one ('drive') conductor may induce a voltage (or current) in the second ('drag') conductor. Frictional drag measurements have mostly been carried out between normal state conductors in coupled 2D semiconductor systems [13][14][15][16][17], graphene systems [18,19], 1D semiconductor systems [20][21][22], 1D complex oxide systems [23], and quantum dot systems [24]. Frictional drag in the superconducting regime has been carried out in normal metal-superconductor systems [25,26] and the phenomenon is explained by the local fluctuating electric field induced by mobile vortices in the superconducting layer [27] or Coulomb coupling between two conductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two electrical conductors are placed in close proximity, current driven through one ('drive') conductor may induce a voltage (or current) in the second ('drag') conductor. Frictional drag measurements have mostly been carried out between normal state conductors in coupled 2D semiconductor systems [13][14][15][16][17], graphene systems [18,19], 1D semiconductor systems [20][21][22], 1D complex oxide systems [23], and quantum dot systems [24]. Frictional drag in the superconducting regime has been carried out in normal metal-superconductor systems [25,26] and the phenomenon is explained by the local fluctuating electric field induced by mobile vortices in the superconducting layer [27] or Coulomb coupling between two conductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…long-range interactions were observed 34 . In ref [35], the model was used to explain superconductivity at vanishing level of doping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Frictional drag measurements have mostly been carried out between normal state conductors in coupled 2D semiconductor systems [13][14][15][16][17], graphene systems [18,19], 1D semiconductor systems [20][21][22], 1D complex oxide systems [23], and quantum dot systems [24]. Frictional drag in the superconducting regime has been carried out in normal metal-superconductor systems [25,26] and the phenomenon is explained by the local fluctuating electric field induced by mobile vortices in the superconducting layer [27] or Coulomb coupling between two conductors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of R 12 in the superconducting regime is qualitatively different from the high magnetic field regime (where the nanowires are not superconducting). In the high magnetic field regime, the drag resistance R ij is antisymmetric [23] with respect to the sourcing current, while the The nature of coupling between nanowires for R S ij and R A ij is still unknown. But according to devices with d ranging from 40nm to 1.5µm , both R S ij and R A ij persist over large separations and are nearly independent…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation