1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.21.1343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Range Antiferromagnetic Spin Correlations in Scandium Metal

Abstract: Alloys of Sc with magnetic impurities show strong anomalies in the concentration dependence of the impurity interaction temperature. This is interpreted with exchange enhancement of the susceptibility of metallic Sc near a finite wave vector.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) theoretically, it is measurable by the temperature dependence of the susceptibility as that thermal energy kT^Ejr'iO) at which the susceptibility begins to drop significantly with rising temperature. We find kT^ 0.005 eV for Ni 3 Ga 5 and kT^-0.01 eV for Sc, 9 i.e., these metals are distinguished by an extremely low intrinsic spinfluctuation energy. We therefore expect their magnetic properties to be sensitive to very small changes in Ej?'…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…(4) theoretically, it is measurable by the temperature dependence of the susceptibility as that thermal energy kT^Ejr'iO) at which the susceptibility begins to drop significantly with rising temperature. We find kT^ 0.005 eV for Ni 3 Ga 5 and kT^-0.01 eV for Sc, 9 i.e., these metals are distinguished by an extremely low intrinsic spinfluctuation energy. We therefore expect their magnetic properties to be sensitive to very small changes in Ej?'…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The existence of such a bound state has been proposed by Wohlleben. 12,17 In light of this model, however, the decrease.…”
Section: Pure Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, AQ (10 O K ) for this alloy may be expected to increase by a t least As alluded to above, Sc depresses T, of Ce-16Y more strongly than does Lu or P u (or Y itself). A possible reason for this may be the incipient antiferromagnetism of Sc metal itself [19]. Sc as an impurity in certain magnetic hosts may be expected to affect the magnetism of the host more strongly than would a normal nonmagnetic impurity because of the tendency of the Sc d-electrons to become independently spin-correlated within the host lattice [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible reason for this may be the incipient antiferromagnetism of Sc metal itself [19]. Sc as an impurity in certain magnetic hosts may be expected to affect the magnetism of the host more strongly than would a normal nonmagnetic impurity because of the tendency of the Sc d-electrons to become independently spin-correlated within the host lattice [19]. It seems not unlikely that the long-range correlations promoted by these d-electrons might be detrimental t o the cooperative interactions among the Ce f-electrons [ZO].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%