“…In spite of this, LAcarb dating may provide ages consistent, within uncertainties, with biostratigraphic and radiometric constraints. This has been shown for meteoric cements in speleothems (Hopley et al ., 2019; Woodhead & Petrus, 2019; Nicholson et al ., 2020) and hardgrounds (Liivamägi et al ., 2018; Scardia et al ., 2019; Kurumada et al ., 2020; Brigaud et al ., 2021; Środoń et al ., 2022), lacustrine tufa, micrites and associated cements (Drost et al ., 2018; Frisch et al ., 2019; Parrish et al ., 2019; Hoareau et al ., 2021; Montano et al ., 2021; Rasbury et al ., 2021), marine cements (Meinhold et al ., 2020; Hoareau et al ., 2021) and bioclasts (Drost et al ., 2018). Despite these remarkable results, no study has attempted to define, solely based on LAcarb, a robust depositional age depth model along an entire stratigraphic section, which was also dated by zircon geochronology.…”