2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl080823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐Lived Tsunami Edge Waves and Shelf Resonance From the M8.2 Tehuantepec Earthquake

Abstract: The 8 September 2017 M8.2 Tehuantepec, Mexico, earthquake ruptured an ~150‐km‐long high‐angle normal fault below the subduction zone megathrust. A tsunami was generated by the event with surveyed runup as large as 3 m. Tide gauges in the region show a remarkably long duration of the tsunami with oscillations within the very wide and shallow Tehuantepec shelf lasting as long as 3 days. Here we produce a model of the tsunami and validate it by comparing it to the tsunami survey and to the time and frequency doma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notable recent catastrophic tsunamis generated by the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman (e.g., Lay et al., 2005), 2010 Maule, Chile (e.g., Yoshimoto et al., 2016), and 2011 Tohoku, Japan (e.g., Yamazaki et al., 2018) earthquakes have caused vast damage over the last two decades. The first tsunami surge is often not the most devastating, due to both wave dispersion and generation of shelf resonance and edge waves (e.g., Geist, 2012) that can result in repeated surges with peak tsunami run‐up occurring hours after the causative earthquake both in the near field (Melgar & Ruiz‐Angulo, 2018; Yamazaki & Cheung, 2011) and far field (Cheung et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable recent catastrophic tsunamis generated by the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman (e.g., Lay et al., 2005), 2010 Maule, Chile (e.g., Yoshimoto et al., 2016), and 2011 Tohoku, Japan (e.g., Yamazaki et al., 2018) earthquakes have caused vast damage over the last two decades. The first tsunami surge is often not the most devastating, due to both wave dispersion and generation of shelf resonance and edge waves (e.g., Geist, 2012) that can result in repeated surges with peak tsunami run‐up occurring hours after the causative earthquake both in the near field (Melgar & Ruiz‐Angulo, 2018; Yamazaki & Cheung, 2011) and far field (Cheung et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies were based on the initial (2-6 h) part of the recorded tsunami waves and did not go into details of their frequency content. The only exception is the work by Melgar and Ruiz-Angulo (2018), who used relatively long tsunami records (of several days) at four Mexican coastal tide gauges to estimate the energy decay and frequency evolution of the 2017 tsunami waves associated with shelf resonance and wave trapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, to isolate the impact of the spatial rupture process, we have designed a simplified topo-bathymetric digital elevation model (DEM), which includes only the first order features. In this way, we avoid unwanted coastal wave processes (which cannot be attributed to the earthquake source process) such as edge waves [5][6][7] , wave focusing on bays and submarine canyons [8][9][10] , resonance on the continental shelf [11][12][13] , among other effects. Other parameters such as geometry and size relative to the earthquake magnitude of the faulting area are of great importance 14 , which show an increase of peak near shore tsunami amplitude, which is primarily due to the peak slip areas within the fault.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%