2011
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-lived Inflammatory Signaling in Irradiated Bone Marrow Is Genome Dependent

Abstract: Ionizing radiation is carcinogenic, but genotype is a key determinant of susceptibility. Mutational DNA damage is generally attributed to cause disease, but irradiation also affects multicellular interactions as a result of poorly understood bystander effects that may influence carcinogenic susceptibility. In this study, we show that the bone marrow of irradiated mice will retain the ability to kill hemopoietic clonogenic stem cells and to induce chromosomal instability for up to 3 months after irradiation. Ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the results from our studies demonstrated that a single dose of 0.1 or 1.0 Gy of 137 Cs γ rays was capable of inducing genomic instability in bone marrow cells of exposed SCID and BALB/cJ, but not C57BL/6J mice. These findings indicate an influence of genetic background on radiosensitivity as previously reported by several investigators [29,30,31,32,33], and an important role of DNA-PKcs in DNA repair. Further, our findings in the mouse models support the observations of the linear relationship for human cancer that appears to hold to a dose of 0.1 Gy as suggested by several investigators [34,35,36,37].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, the results from our studies demonstrated that a single dose of 0.1 or 1.0 Gy of 137 Cs γ rays was capable of inducing genomic instability in bone marrow cells of exposed SCID and BALB/cJ, but not C57BL/6J mice. These findings indicate an influence of genetic background on radiosensitivity as previously reported by several investigators [29,30,31,32,33], and an important role of DNA-PKcs in DNA repair. Further, our findings in the mouse models support the observations of the linear relationship for human cancer that appears to hold to a dose of 0.1 Gy as suggested by several investigators [34,35,36,37].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In vivo manifestations mostly involve shielding part of the body while targeting another part (Pazzaglia et al, 2009, Koturbash et al, 2011 or use of parabiotic animals, one partner being shielded by lead while the unshielded partner is exposed to X-irradiation (Woenckhaus 1930) and as such are really abscopal rather than true bystander effects. Other approaches involve irradiation in vivo followed by in vitro culture (Lorimore et al, 2011, Mukherjee et al, 2012, Rastogi et al, 2012. The data reported here are from high dose exposed rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…microRNA expression) were detected as early as several hours after whole body irradiation of mice, and persisted for days, weeks, and even months after irradiation [79]. Together, the changes due to radiation-induced chronic inflammation and perturbations in oxidative metabolism can lead to genomic instability in targeted and non-targeted cells [81], causing serious health effects, including neurodegeneration, cardiovascular diseases and cancer [82; 83; 84]. …”
Section: Primary Effects Of Ionizing Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%