Abstract:Cellular exposure to ionizing radiation leads to oxidizing events that alter atomic structure through direct interactions of radiation with target macromolecules or via products of water radiolysis. Further, the oxidative damage may spread from the targeted to neighboring, non-targeted bystander cells through redox-modulated intercellular communication mechanisms. To cope with the induced stress and the changes in the redox environment, organisms elicit transient responses at the molecular, cellular and tissue… Show more
“…Our data seem to be consistent with the existence of a protective effect, but are not conclusive. It is tempting to speculate that one may see a protective effect in other measures such as behavior.The physiological responses inferred from our gene expression study (Table 3) are consistent with the oxidative theory of radiation damage (Bokov et al 2004;Azzam et al 2012): radiation damages cells by creating reactive oxygen species and other oxidizing agents that damage cell components, in addition to direct damage from the radiation. Perturbations in oxidative metabolism, including oxidative phosphorylation (oxphos) Endocytosis and the sulfur relay system are types of transport, which are affected by oxidative damage to lipid bilayers in the cell membrane (Azzam et al 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…This suggests that the effects seen at later days could be due to chronic effects of oxidative stress, possibly from continuous generation of reactive oxygen species as described in Azzam et al (2012).…”
ᮀ We investigate the biological effects of radiation using adult Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism, focusing on gene expression and lifespan analysis to determine the effect of different radiation doses. Our results support a threshold effect in response to radiation: no effect on lifespan and no permanent effect on gene expression is seen at incident radiation levels below 100 J/kg. We also find that it is more appropriate to compare radiation effects in flies using the absorbed energy rather than incident radiation levels. Although it is reasonable to assume that radiation damage to DNA and other cellular machinery is linear as a function of radiation dosage (as has been used in development of radiation protection standards), actual damage is mitigated by cellular repair mechanisms. These repair mechanisms probably increase initially, then reach a maximum so that, depending on parameters, various non-linear curves are possible. It may even be that there is a protective effect due to increased damage response to small amounts of radiation or other types of biological stress.
Key terms: low dose radiation, gene expression, Drosophila melanogaster, threshold effect
INTRODUCTIONThe goal of this paper is to investigate the biological effects of radiation using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism, focusing on gene expression and lifespan analysis to determine the effect of different radiation doses, especially near the threshold. Previous research has been done on the effects of radiation on Drosophila lifespan, including research Address correspondence to Leon N. Cooper. Box 1843, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912-1843; Phone: (401) 863-2172; Email: Leon_Cooper@brown.edu on flies in different developmental stages (Vaiserman et al. 1999; Vaiserman et al. 2003; Vaiserman et al. 2004a; Vaiserman et al. 2004b;Moskalev et al. 2011;Seong et al. 2011;Koana et al. 2012) and in adults (Gowen and Stadler 1952;Strehler 1962;Sacher 1963;Lamb 1964;Noethel 1965;Baxter and Blair 1967a;Lamb and Smith 1969;Giess and Planel 1973;Planel and Giess 1973). Each of these papers supports the idea of a threshold -a model where radiation dose does not affect mortality negatively below a certain dose.
RESULTS
Demography ExperimentA demography experiment was done, as detailed in the methods section. Adult flies were irradiated at age 24-48 hours post-eclosion with incident radiation levels 1 ranging from 0 to 400 J/kg. The results of the demography experiment are shown in Figure 2 and Table 1, as well as supplemental Figure S1. We did not detect any significant difference among the lifespans of flies exposed to radiation less than or equal to 50 J/kg (based on log rank test results, shown in supplemental Tables S2 For comparison to (Baxter and Blair 1967a) data whose incident irradiation values are reported in Roentgen (R), we take these values as the proportional ionization analogue of ICRU recommended air kerma (ICRU 2011) and convert them to J/kg (or Gy) using 1R = 0.01 J/kg (Gy) (e.g. Wyckoff (1983) 1 R = 0...
“…Our data seem to be consistent with the existence of a protective effect, but are not conclusive. It is tempting to speculate that one may see a protective effect in other measures such as behavior.The physiological responses inferred from our gene expression study (Table 3) are consistent with the oxidative theory of radiation damage (Bokov et al 2004;Azzam et al 2012): radiation damages cells by creating reactive oxygen species and other oxidizing agents that damage cell components, in addition to direct damage from the radiation. Perturbations in oxidative metabolism, including oxidative phosphorylation (oxphos) Endocytosis and the sulfur relay system are types of transport, which are affected by oxidative damage to lipid bilayers in the cell membrane (Azzam et al 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…This suggests that the effects seen at later days could be due to chronic effects of oxidative stress, possibly from continuous generation of reactive oxygen species as described in Azzam et al (2012).…”
ᮀ We investigate the biological effects of radiation using adult Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism, focusing on gene expression and lifespan analysis to determine the effect of different radiation doses. Our results support a threshold effect in response to radiation: no effect on lifespan and no permanent effect on gene expression is seen at incident radiation levels below 100 J/kg. We also find that it is more appropriate to compare radiation effects in flies using the absorbed energy rather than incident radiation levels. Although it is reasonable to assume that radiation damage to DNA and other cellular machinery is linear as a function of radiation dosage (as has been used in development of radiation protection standards), actual damage is mitigated by cellular repair mechanisms. These repair mechanisms probably increase initially, then reach a maximum so that, depending on parameters, various non-linear curves are possible. It may even be that there is a protective effect due to increased damage response to small amounts of radiation or other types of biological stress.
Key terms: low dose radiation, gene expression, Drosophila melanogaster, threshold effect
INTRODUCTIONThe goal of this paper is to investigate the biological effects of radiation using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism, focusing on gene expression and lifespan analysis to determine the effect of different radiation doses, especially near the threshold. Previous research has been done on the effects of radiation on Drosophila lifespan, including research Address correspondence to Leon N. Cooper. Box 1843, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912-1843; Phone: (401) 863-2172; Email: Leon_Cooper@brown.edu on flies in different developmental stages (Vaiserman et al. 1999; Vaiserman et al. 2003; Vaiserman et al. 2004a; Vaiserman et al. 2004b;Moskalev et al. 2011;Seong et al. 2011;Koana et al. 2012) and in adults (Gowen and Stadler 1952;Strehler 1962;Sacher 1963;Lamb 1964;Noethel 1965;Baxter and Blair 1967a;Lamb and Smith 1969;Giess and Planel 1973;Planel and Giess 1973). Each of these papers supports the idea of a threshold -a model where radiation dose does not affect mortality negatively below a certain dose.
RESULTS
Demography ExperimentA demography experiment was done, as detailed in the methods section. Adult flies were irradiated at age 24-48 hours post-eclosion with incident radiation levels 1 ranging from 0 to 400 J/kg. The results of the demography experiment are shown in Figure 2 and Table 1, as well as supplemental Figure S1. We did not detect any significant difference among the lifespans of flies exposed to radiation less than or equal to 50 J/kg (based on log rank test results, shown in supplemental Tables S2 For comparison to (Baxter and Blair 1967a) data whose incident irradiation values are reported in Roentgen (R), we take these values as the proportional ionization analogue of ICRU recommended air kerma (ICRU 2011) and convert them to J/kg (or Gy) using 1R = 0.01 J/kg (Gy) (e.g. Wyckoff (1983) 1 R = 0...
“…Cellular ROS levels can also increase as a result of UV irradiation, ionizing radiation, toxins such as heavy metals, chemotherapy, and neighboring inflammatory cells, although the mechanisms vary widely (Federico et al 2007;Azzam et al 2012;Vera-Ramirez et al 2012). For example, the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin forms a complex with topoisomerase and DNA that leads to double-strand breaks, increasing ROS levels and potentiating cellular damage (Lyu et al 2007;Rowe et al 2008;Zhang et al 2012).…”
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules that arise from a number of cellular sources, including oxidative metabolism in mitochondria. At low levels they can be advantageous to cells, activating signaling pathways that promote proliferation or survival. At higher levels, ROS can damage or kill cells by oxidizing proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. It was hypothesized that antioxidants might benefit high-risk patients by reducing the rate of ROS-induced mutations and delaying cancer initiation. However, dietary supplementation with antioxidants has generally proven ineffective or detrimental in clinical trials. High ROS levels limit cancer cell survival during certain windows of cancer initiation and progression. During these periods, dietary supplementation with antioxidants may promote cancer cell survival and cancer progression. This raises the possibility that rather than treating cancer patients with antioxidants, they should be treated with pro-oxidants that exacerbate oxidative stress or block metabolic adaptations that confer oxidative stress resistance.
“…The persistence of such effects in progeny cells has profound implications for long-term health risks, including emergence of a second malignancy after radiotherapy (1). The thyroid gland is one of the most sensitive organs to the carcinogenetic effects of IR.…”
Ionizing radiation (IR) causes not only acute tissue damage, but also late effects in several cell generations after the initial exposure. The thyroid gland is one of the most sensitive organs to the carcinogenic effects of IR, and we have recently highlighted that an oxidative stress is responsible for the chromosomal rearrangements found in radio-induced papillary thyroid carcinoma. Using both a human thyroid cell line and primary thyrocytes, we investigated the mechanism by which IR induces the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) several days after irradiation. We focused on NADPH oxidases, which are specialized ROS-generating enzymes known as NOX/DUOX. Our results show that IR induces delayed NADPH oxidase DUOX1-dependent H 2 O 2 production in a dose-dependent manner, which is sustained for several days. We report that p38 MAPK, activated after IR, increased DUOX1 via IL-13 expression, leading to persistent DNA damage and growth arrest. Pretreatment of cells with catalase, a scavenger of H 2 O 2 , or DUOX1 down-regulation by siRNA abrogated IR-induced DNA damage. Analysis of human thyroid tissues showed that DUOX1 is elevated not only in human radio-induced thyroid tumors, but also in sporadic thyroid tumors. Taken together, our data reveal a key role of DUOX1-dependent H 2 O 2 production in long-term persistent radio-induced DNA damage. Our data also show that DUOX1-dependent H 2 O 2 production, which induces DNA double-strand breaks, can cause genomic instability and promote the generation of neoplastic cells through its mutagenic effect.ionizing radiation | oxidative stress | NADPH oxidase | thyroid |
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.