“…Columns 1 and 2 indicate short-term effects (see Figure 3a), based on data recorded from single MNs during, and 15 min after tsDCS (0.1 mA) application, compared to control recordings before the onset of polarization (averaged across MNs in anodal [N = 10] or cathodal [N = 10] polarization groups, Bączyk et al, 2019); columns 3 and 4 present long-lasting effects (see Figure 3b), based on data averaged across separate groups of neurons, recorded during the first 30 min (N = 22 for anodal tsDCS, N = 21, for cathodal tsDCS), and between 30 and 60 min (N = 21 for anodal tsDCS, N = 22, for cathodal tsDCS) after the offset of tsDCS (0.1 mA), respectively, compared to the prepolarization group (N = 36) from which records were made prior to the onset of tsDCS (Bączyk et al, 2020a); column 5 shows chronic effects (see Figure 3c), based on data averaged for MNs recorded after repeated transcutaneous application of anodal (N = 39) or cathodal (N = 43) tsDCS (0.5 mA, 15 min daily, for 5 weeks), compared to the sham control group (N = 41; Bączyk et al, 2020b F I G U R E 4 Summary of the changes in the frequency-current (f-I) relationship during rhythmic steady-state firing (SSF) for MNs subjected to various polarization protocols. The linear relationship between the discharge frequency and injected current was assessed for each MN on the equation y = ax + b, where a determines the slope of the relationship in the primary range.…”