Abstract:The review surveys various aspects of the plasticity of nerve fibres, in particular the prolonged increase in their excitability evoked by polarization, focusing on a long-lasting increase in the excitability of myelinated afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns of the spinal cord. We review the evidence that increased axonal excitability (i) follows epidurally applied direct current as well as relatively short (5 or 10 ms) current pulses and synaptically evoked intrinsic field potentials; (ii) criticall… Show more
“…When the refractory period was shortened by epidural depolarisation, the second of the paired stimuli applied during the relative refractory period evoked significantly larger nerve volleys and thus activated larger numbers of dorsal column nerve fibres, indicating that the shortening of the refractory period was combined with an increase in the excitability of the dorsal column fibres. The DC‐evoked shortening of the refractory period might accordingly, as the DC‐evoked increase of the excitability of dorsal column fibres (see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Li et al, 2020), be linked to their branching regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most marked differences between fibres stimulated within and outside the dorsal columns will probably lie in the morphology of afferent fibres at their branching sites, as the denuded areas of the axons at the sites where axon collaterals are issued are much larger than the nodes of Ranvier in peripheral nerves (see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Lucas‐Osma et al, 2018; Nicol & Walmsley, 1991). These differences in morphology may be combined with differences in membrane properties and the voltage‐gated and other ion channels, but the features of the branching regions of dorsal column fibres have only recently become the focus of investigation (Hari et al, 2021; Lucas‐Osma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of epidural polarisation (1 μA for 1 min) were tested both on the excitability and the refractory period of dorsal column fibres (Figure 1a). Changes in the excitability were defined as described previously, using nerve volleys evoked by near-threshold stimuli (20-30 μA) (for references, see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021). The degree of excitability was established during a 5 min control period and subsequently during 1 min of cathodal DC application followed by a 15 min post-polarisation period.…”
Section: Epidural Stimulation and Polarisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have revealed a considerable degree of both short‐ and long‐term plasticity in nerve fibre properties (for recent references, see Bucher & Goaillard, 2011; Debanne, 2004; Debanne et al, 2011; Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Suminaite et al, 2019). Our own interest has been in the long‐lasting increase in the excitability of afferent nerve fibres providing input to the spinal cord following their short‐lasting epidural direct current (DC) polarisation (Bączyk & Jankowska, 2018; Jankowska et al, 2017; Li et al, 2020) which might enhance effects of clinical rehabilitation procedures combined with spinal polarisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will also be shown that the refractory period of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns is nearly half of that of fibres in either peripheral nerves or in the dorsal roots and is modulated to a much greater extent. These specific properties of the dorsal column fibres relate the long‐lasting effects of DC on the refractoriness to those on the excitability of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns and thereby to their branching regions (for references, see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Li et al, 2020).…”
The main question addressed in this study was whether the refractoriness of nerve fibres can be modulated by their depolarisation and, if so, whether depolarisation of nerve fibres evokes a long-term decrease in the duration of the refractory period as well as the previously demonstrated increase in their excitability. This was investigated on nerve fibres within the dorsal columns, dorsal roots and peripheral nerves in deeply anaesthetised rats in vivo. The results revealed major differences depending on the sites of fibre stimulation and polarisation. Firstly, the relative refractory period was found to be shorter in epidurally stimulated dorsal column fibres than in fibres stimulated at other sites. Secondly, the minimal effective interstimulus intervals reflecting the absolute refractory period were likewise shorter for nerve fibres within the dorsal columns even though action potentials evoked by the second of a pair of stimuli were similarly delayed with respect to the preceding action potentials at all the stimulation sites. Thirdly, the minimal interstimulus intervals were reduced by epidurally applied cathodal direct current polarisation but not at other stimulation sites. Consequently, higher proportions of dorsal column fibres could be excited at higher frequencies, especially following their depolarisation, at interstimulus intervals as short as 0.5-0.7 ms. The results demonstrate that epidural depolarisation results in long-lasting effects not only on the excitability but also on the refractoriness of dorsal column fibres. They also provide further evidence for specific features of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns previously linked to properties of their branching regions.
“…When the refractory period was shortened by epidural depolarisation, the second of the paired stimuli applied during the relative refractory period evoked significantly larger nerve volleys and thus activated larger numbers of dorsal column nerve fibres, indicating that the shortening of the refractory period was combined with an increase in the excitability of the dorsal column fibres. The DC‐evoked shortening of the refractory period might accordingly, as the DC‐evoked increase of the excitability of dorsal column fibres (see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Li et al, 2020), be linked to their branching regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most marked differences between fibres stimulated within and outside the dorsal columns will probably lie in the morphology of afferent fibres at their branching sites, as the denuded areas of the axons at the sites where axon collaterals are issued are much larger than the nodes of Ranvier in peripheral nerves (see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Lucas‐Osma et al, 2018; Nicol & Walmsley, 1991). These differences in morphology may be combined with differences in membrane properties and the voltage‐gated and other ion channels, but the features of the branching regions of dorsal column fibres have only recently become the focus of investigation (Hari et al, 2021; Lucas‐Osma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of epidural polarisation (1 μA for 1 min) were tested both on the excitability and the refractory period of dorsal column fibres (Figure 1a). Changes in the excitability were defined as described previously, using nerve volleys evoked by near-threshold stimuli (20-30 μA) (for references, see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021). The degree of excitability was established during a 5 min control period and subsequently during 1 min of cathodal DC application followed by a 15 min post-polarisation period.…”
Section: Epidural Stimulation and Polarisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have revealed a considerable degree of both short‐ and long‐term plasticity in nerve fibre properties (for recent references, see Bucher & Goaillard, 2011; Debanne, 2004; Debanne et al, 2011; Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Suminaite et al, 2019). Our own interest has been in the long‐lasting increase in the excitability of afferent nerve fibres providing input to the spinal cord following their short‐lasting epidural direct current (DC) polarisation (Bączyk & Jankowska, 2018; Jankowska et al, 2017; Li et al, 2020) which might enhance effects of clinical rehabilitation procedures combined with spinal polarisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will also be shown that the refractory period of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns is nearly half of that of fibres in either peripheral nerves or in the dorsal roots and is modulated to a much greater extent. These specific properties of the dorsal column fibres relate the long‐lasting effects of DC on the refractoriness to those on the excitability of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns and thereby to their branching regions (for references, see Jankowska & Hammar, 2021; Li et al, 2020).…”
The main question addressed in this study was whether the refractoriness of nerve fibres can be modulated by their depolarisation and, if so, whether depolarisation of nerve fibres evokes a long-term decrease in the duration of the refractory period as well as the previously demonstrated increase in their excitability. This was investigated on nerve fibres within the dorsal columns, dorsal roots and peripheral nerves in deeply anaesthetised rats in vivo. The results revealed major differences depending on the sites of fibre stimulation and polarisation. Firstly, the relative refractory period was found to be shorter in epidurally stimulated dorsal column fibres than in fibres stimulated at other sites. Secondly, the minimal effective interstimulus intervals reflecting the absolute refractory period were likewise shorter for nerve fibres within the dorsal columns even though action potentials evoked by the second of a pair of stimuli were similarly delayed with respect to the preceding action potentials at all the stimulation sites. Thirdly, the minimal interstimulus intervals were reduced by epidurally applied cathodal direct current polarisation but not at other stimulation sites. Consequently, higher proportions of dorsal column fibres could be excited at higher frequencies, especially following their depolarisation, at interstimulus intervals as short as 0.5-0.7 ms. The results demonstrate that epidural depolarisation results in long-lasting effects not only on the excitability but also on the refractoriness of dorsal column fibres. They also provide further evidence for specific features of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns previously linked to properties of their branching regions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.