2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014gl060559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐ and short‐term postseismic gravity changes of megathrust earthquakes from satellite gravimetry

Abstract: Using monthly satellite gravimetry data, we studied time-variable gravity field after three M9 class earthquakes, the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman, 2010 Chile (Maule), and 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquakes. The observations showed that the gravity typically (1) decreases coseismically, (2) continues to decrease for a few months, and (3) increases over a longer period. Therefore, postseismic gravity changes have two components with different time constants and polarities. The mechanisms of short-and long-term postseismic gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This signal can be seen as a drop or a jump in the gravity change in the first three months after the quake, which rebounds as an exponential curve in the following months (Figures 1(a, b)). A similar pattern in time was found for the 2004 Sumatra and the 2010 Chile earthquakes by Tanaka and Heki (2014), who used two exponential functions to fit the data. The physical mechanism of this signal is not clear and to model it would be beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Co-seismic Gravity Changes By Grace Measurementssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This signal can be seen as a drop or a jump in the gravity change in the first three months after the quake, which rebounds as an exponential curve in the following months (Figures 1(a, b)). A similar pattern in time was found for the 2004 Sumatra and the 2010 Chile earthquakes by Tanaka and Heki (2014), who used two exponential functions to fit the data. The physical mechanism of this signal is not clear and to model it would be beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Co-seismic Gravity Changes By Grace Measurementssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The solutions are presented in Figure 9: (a) for the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman, (b) the 2010 Maule, and (c) the 2011 Tohoku events. In general the coseismic pattern switch to the postseismic pattern where a dominantly monopolar gravity increase now occurs over the epicentral region, as has been explained by the mechanism of viscous relaxation of the upper mantle (e.g., Panet et al, 2007;Tanaka & Heki, 2014). A large decrease seen east of the epicentral region of the 2010 Maule is due to land hydrology as it disappears upon the removal of the latter signal (cf.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The ongoing response of the Earth's mantle to past changes in loading gives rises to additional GRD, known as glacial‐isostatic adjustment (GIA; e.g., Farrell & Clark ; Lambeck et al, ; Peltier et al, ). The height of the land also changes in response to processes such as sediment compaction (in some cases, accelerated by anthropogenic groundwater or hydrocarbon withdrawal) (e.g., Keogh & Törnqvist, ), tectonics (e.g., Tanaka & Heki, ), and mantle dynamics (Rowley et al, ).…”
Section: Projections Of Relative Sea Level Changementioning
confidence: 99%