2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loneliness, Social Networks, and Health: A Cross-Sectional Study in Three Countries

Abstract: ObjectiveIt is widely recognized that social networks and loneliness have effects on health. The present study assesses the differential association that the components of the social network and the subjective perception of loneliness have with health, and analyzes whether this association is different across different countries.MethodsA total of 10 800 adults were interviewed in Finland, Poland and Spain. Loneliness was assessed by means of the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. Individuals’ social networks were m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
97
4
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(83 reference statements)
13
97
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…People living alone do not have the same amounts of contacts to the rest of the society (as for instance people living together with friends or family). Poor social support has been found to be associated with a lower participation rate (Hoebel et al, 2014) and loneliness and living alone is (together with poor social network) associated with poorer health status (Rico-Uribe et al, 2016). Together with our positive finding of inviting spouses together, this suggests that other ways of recruiting people, for instance through social networks (family, friends, clubs, societies, or at work) might work as a way of increasing participation rate in health checks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People living alone do not have the same amounts of contacts to the rest of the society (as for instance people living together with friends or family). Poor social support has been found to be associated with a lower participation rate (Hoebel et al, 2014) and loneliness and living alone is (together with poor social network) associated with poorer health status (Rico-Uribe et al, 2016). Together with our positive finding of inviting spouses together, this suggests that other ways of recruiting people, for instance through social networks (family, friends, clubs, societies, or at work) might work as a way of increasing participation rate in health checks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loneliness has been defined as a discrepancy between desired and real social relations [1] and is associated with decreases in health status and quality of life [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social isolation can be defined as a paucity of social contacts, while loneliness is described as the subjective experience of social isolation. Both have been associated with increased risks for poor self-reported health [4][5][6], depressive symptoms [7,8], cognitive decline [9][10][11], coronary heart disease and stroke [12,13], and all-cause mortality [14][15][16] among older men and women. Both are thought to influence health outcomes through direct biological mechanisms, as evidenced by their independent associations with increased inflammatory and stress biomarkers, as well as through health-related behavioral mechanisms [1,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%