2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistic performance evaluation of provinces in Turkey: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, a matrix composed of preference relations ( p k s) are formed as given in Eq. (20). Table 2 Obtained envelops for the HFLTS given in Table 1 Goal F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 HFLTS intervals for DM1's evaluations where p k i j shows the degree of preference of the alternative x i over x j according to expert e k .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, a matrix composed of preference relations ( p k s) are formed as given in Eq. (20). Table 2 Obtained envelops for the HFLTS given in Table 1 Goal F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 HFLTS intervals for DM1's evaluations where p k i j shows the degree of preference of the alternative x i over x j according to expert e k .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Özceylan et al [20] propose a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach for the logistics performance evaluation of provinces in Turkey. They use AHP, ANP and TOPSIS methods prioritizing the indicators and ranking the provinces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demirel et al [26] use a hybrid method composed of fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to select the most effective roll stabilizing system to be used in a trawler type fishing boat. Although they do not use a fuzzy method, in the further research part of their conclusion, Özceylan et al [27] mention some shortcomings of their research, and advise researchers to adopt fuzzy multi criteria decision making approaches like fuzzy AHP to cope with fuzziness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang and Chen [26] compared and explored three major international hub ports in Northeast Asia according to logistics competitiveness by using AHP and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA). Ozceylan et al [27] considered logistics competitiveness evaluation of Turkey's provinces. They used geographic information system and MCDM tools to determine logistics scores of 16 geographic and economic indicators.…”
Section: Logistics Competitiveness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors are grouped as: supply and demand capability, economic development capability and transportation development level. Ozceylan et al [27] proposed that the logistic performance of a province can be addressed within three main dimensions: freight transaction factors, transportation capability factors, and economic and infrastructure factors.…”
Section: The Dataset and Criteria For Logistics Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%