2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
372
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 700 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
372
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jointly learning local feature description and matching. Several methods have recently proposed to jointly learn to compute and match descriptors [27,39,40,43,48]. All these methods use a siamese Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to obtain dense local descriptors, but they significantly differ regarding the way they establish matches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Jointly learning local feature description and matching. Several methods have recently proposed to jointly learn to compute and match descriptors [27,39,40,43,48]. All these methods use a siamese Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to obtain dense local descriptors, but they significantly differ regarding the way they establish matches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 4D correlation tensor is then used as input to a second network that learns to modify it using soft-MNN and 4D convolutions. Instead of summarizing all the information into a 4D correlation tensor, the second category of methods [43,48] rely on so-called Transformers [10,15,19,26,37,52,55] to let the descriptors of both images communicate and adapt to each other. All these methods again focus on identifying correctly covisible correspondences and consider non-covisible correspondences as noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As various setups had been used for this evaluation [21,73,53,63], it is relatively difficult to make firm conclusions from Table 1. Even if almost in every setup RANSAC is employed for homography estimation, independent setups utilized different implementations (OpenCV and pydegensac).…”
Section: Homography Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%