1970
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(197007)7:3<292::aid-pits2310070319>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locus of evaluation for classroom work and the development of creative potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers used to believe that extrinsic motivation was detrimental to creative performance (Amabile, , ; Amabile & Gryskiewicz, ). For instance, the previous research found that rewards diminished participants’ creativity (Amabile, ; Amabile, Hennessey & Grossman, ; Hennessey, ); if participants were told that their works would be evaluated, their creativity was significantly reduced (Amabile, ; White & Owen, ). Some researchers have argued that these negative results may come from the “undermining effect” of extrinsic motivation on intrinsic motivation (Deci, ; Deci, Koestner & Ryan, ; Hitt, Marriott & Esser, ).…”
Section: Extrinsic Motivation and Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers used to believe that extrinsic motivation was detrimental to creative performance (Amabile, , ; Amabile & Gryskiewicz, ). For instance, the previous research found that rewards diminished participants’ creativity (Amabile, ; Amabile, Hennessey & Grossman, ; Hennessey, ); if participants were told that their works would be evaluated, their creativity was significantly reduced (Amabile, ; White & Owen, ). Some researchers have argued that these negative results may come from the “undermining effect” of extrinsic motivation on intrinsic motivation (Deci, ; Deci, Koestner & Ryan, ; Hitt, Marriott & Esser, ).…”
Section: Extrinsic Motivation and Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greene and Lepper (1974) and Lepper, Greene, and Nisbett (1973) reported that children who expected rewards produced poorer quality drawings than did those who did not expect a reward. White and Owen (1970) found that the creative performance of elementary school boys in a self-evaluation group was significantly better than was that of boys in a peer-evaluation group. Amabile (1979Amabile ( , 1982b showed that both the expectation of external eyaluation and competition for prizes decreased the judged creatiyity of collages, relatiye to those of subjects who were not eyaluated, or who did not compete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The interpersonal evaluations, including those of employers, managers or supervisors, may use a rubric or guide that consists of some criteria reflecting the agreed-upon expectations. Intrapersonal evaluation was seen to be less beneficial to creativity than interpersonal evaluation (White & Owen, 1970;Poole, Williams & Lett, 1977).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ideasmentioning
confidence: 86%