2017
DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711010057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locking versus Non-locking Neutralization Plates with Limited Excision and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Extra-articular Type a Distal Tibial Fractures

Abstract: Purpose:This study aimed to compare the clinical, radiologic, and cost-effectiveness results between locking and non-locking plates for the treatment of extra-articular type A distal tibial fractures.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of AO/OTA 42-A1, A2 distal tibial fractures treated by plates from January 2011 to June 2013. Patients were divided to the locking plate group or the non-locking plate group. Clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and hospitalization fee were compared between the two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They did not nevertheless, their study had a retrospective design and had a low sample size which could affect the results. The material properties of locking plates also make them more expensive than non-locking ones, and developing countries have less access to them [ 36 , 37 ]. However, we used a standard non-locking T-plate due to lower cost and accessibility in our developing country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They did not nevertheless, their study had a retrospective design and had a low sample size which could affect the results. The material properties of locking plates also make them more expensive than non-locking ones, and developing countries have less access to them [ 36 , 37 ]. However, we used a standard non-locking T-plate due to lower cost and accessibility in our developing country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T-plate does not enter the subacromial space and thus does not induce rotator cuff damage or impingement [ 17 19 , 22 , 39 ]. This technique induced lower cost than locking one [ 36 , 37 ], and having no prior plan for plate removal surgery in the absence of symptoms made it more affordable than hook plate fixation [ 40 ]. It is crucial in developing countries such as ours that have limited access to expensive implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixation of the assembly is performed by the use of different kind of plates. In general, they can be divided into two general groups: Locking plates and Non-locking plates [9,11]. Locking plates provide better stability of the assembly and do not require precontouring of the plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%