2014
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e31829f9504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locked Plating of Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures

Abstract: Only the screw nearest the gap had significant effect on torsional and failure stiffness but not axial stiffness. Construct mechanics depended on the type of screw placed in this position. This screw nearest the fracture dictates working length stiffness when the working length itself is constant and in turn determines overall construct stiffness in osteoporotic bone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field et al [7] found that the selectively reducing number of fixed screws had few impacts on the structural stiffness and bone surface stress of internal fixation system; however, optimized scheme of screw configurations was not obtained. Cui et al [8] reported that the axial strength of the device was not affected by the proximal screw, but in a certain working length of plate, proximal screws determined the strength of the internal fixation system. In Katthagen et al's study [9], different plate materials and screws can change the stiffness and limit stress of the locking plate; however, the structural parameters of the plate were not analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field et al [7] found that the selectively reducing number of fixed screws had few impacts on the structural stiffness and bone surface stress of internal fixation system; however, optimized scheme of screw configurations was not obtained. Cui et al [8] reported that the axial strength of the device was not affected by the proximal screw, but in a certain working length of plate, proximal screws determined the strength of the internal fixation system. In Katthagen et al's study [9], different plate materials and screws can change the stiffness and limit stress of the locking plate; however, the structural parameters of the plate were not analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCP dynamization procedure modifies rigid locking compression plates into more flexible constructs, reducing strain on the plate and increasing axial strain on the fracture ends. In fact, the modification of the plate-screw interface at the diaphysis level provides axial micromovement without shear or fixation failure and promotes a more uniform annular callus [93][94][95]. However, LCP dynamization has clinical limitations, including an increased risk of infection due to re-incision to expose the soft tissues and the potential loss of stability during screw replacement, with the risk of re-fracture of the bridging callus if the timing is inappropriate.…”
Section: Locking Plate Dynamization (Active Dynamization or Temporal ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we have used the term 'hybrid' construct in the latter context. Biomechanical studies have shown that only the locking screws placed in the distal segment are important for axial and torsional stiffness of the construct, with proximally unlocked (hybrid) plates showing equivalent axial and torsional stiffness, as fully locked plates [22]. Thus, the LCPs may be preferred over LISS plates in simple fracture configurations, where compression plating is required.…”
Section: Locked Versus Hybrid Platingmentioning
confidence: 99%