Locational marginal pricing‐based allocation of transmission capacity in multiple electricity markets

Karimi, Alì; Seifi, Hossein; Sheikh‐El‐Eslami, Mohammad Kazem

doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0544

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The areas are identical as regard to the distribution of loads and the location and capacity of the generators. However, they differ by the generator offers, which are the cheapest in area A and the most expensive in area C [19]. In Fig.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4, the maximum production capacities of the generators (in megawatts (MW)), the offers of the generators (in $/MWh) and the loads (in MW) are shown. Transmission data of the test system are shown in [19]. A3B3, A4C4 and B4C3 are the inter‐area transmission lines.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The possibility for players to, simultaneously, place their bids in different markets across an interconnection is investigated in [18]. Karimi Varkani et al [19] present a new framework for the cooperation of multiple markets. In this framework, the MOs are responsible for the clearing the markets (decentralised).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the congestion management of the network, a coordinator allocates the transmission capacities among the markets, based on locational marginal pricing (an iterative approach). In [19], it is assumed that there are several markets, independently, in each of the areas. From a practical viewpoint, on conditions that the areas’ policies for the power sector are coordinated, this framework can be applicable.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Market‐based mechanism for multi‐area power exchange management in a multiple electricity market

Karimi

Seifi

Sheikh‐El‐Eslami

2015

IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cross-border trading in an interconnected multi-area power system (MAPS) has significantly increased in recent years. In this situation, the coordination of electricity markets in MAPS is very imperative. In this study, in the presence of multiple markets in an MAPS structure, it is assumed that there is a single market in each area, and the participation of external players in each market is possible. A market-based mechanism for power exchange management is designed by a proposed central coordinator entity. In this mechanism, two main roles are considered for the coordinator, namely, the determination of the external network equivalents for each area, and the management of power exchange in an iterative decision-making process to maintain system security. The designed mechanism uses the proposed power exchange management factors matrix. Then, a market process is run for the management of external player's exchanges. The numerical results for a small-scale (15-bus) test system as well as the IEEE RTS-96 system are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism.

show abstract

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Market‐based mechanism for multi‐area power exchange management in a multiple electricity market

Karimi

Seifi

Sheikh‐El‐Eslami

2015

IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Взаимосвязь режима энергосистемы и узловых цен рассмотрена в работах [5,6]. Влияние электрических сетей на цены часто рассматривается только с позиций учета пропускной способности (например, работа [7], в которой рассматривается взаимодействие локальных рынков электроэнергии, или [8], посвященная стратегии коммерческой и технологической диспетчеризации активной распределительной сети). Таким же образом в [9] учитывается функционирование электрических сетей при взаимодействии поставщика розничного рынка электроэнергии и агрегатора спроса.…”

Section: введение (Introduction)unclassified

Identification of the sharing contribution of the power supply system power sources to the electricity losses and their cost

Malafeev

2023

«Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. PROBLEMY ENERGETIKI»

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

THE PURPOSE. Consider the problems of estimating the cost of services for the transmission of electricity through the electric networks of territorial grid organizations (TGOs), including large industrial enterprises with the status of TGOs and their own generation. Develop a methodology for calculating the cost of electricity losses in the elements of the power supply system of such enterprises, taking into account the technical and economic characteristics of the sources. Develop a methodology for determining the share contribution of individual sources and consumers to electricity losses and their cost. Calculate the cost of electricity losses and the structure of the contribution to it of power sources of an industrial TGO enterprise and draw conclusions. METHODS. When solving the tasks set, methods for calculating steady-state modes of power supply systems were used. RESULTS. The article describes the relevance of the topic, created calculation methods, in the conditions of a large industrial power center, the system of payment by sub-subscribers of an industrial enterprise for services for the transmission of electricity and its relationship with the flow distribution is considered. The structure of the contribution of power sources to the losses of electricity in the power supply system is analyzed. An approach has been formulated to adjust the individual tariff for the purchase of electricity losses, taking into account the placement of power sources in the power supply system. Recommendations are given to reduce the degree of undercompensation of the cost of electricity transmission services by third-party consumers. It is proposed to use for these purposes the norms of technological losses of electricity (NTLE), determined by the cost of losses. CONCLUSION. Under the current regulatory framework, it is in the interests of TGO enterprises to distribute sub-subscribers in the scheme in such a way that their actual NTLE, determined taking into account the targeting of losses, does not exceed the calculated NTLE. In this case, there is no transfer of the cost of losses from sub-subscribers to the own consumption of the TGO enterprise. At the same time, sub-subscribers do not incur additional costs, since they pay off with the guaranteeing supplier at the boiler tariff. NTLE for these purposes must be determined by the cost of losses, taking into account the characteristics of the sources. The share of payment for losses in the networks of an TGO enterprise, which goes to its own consumption and is not compensated by sub-subscribers, is reduced. Consequently, the amount of costs for electricity and their share in the cost of finished products of the TGO enterprise is reduced.

show abstract

Multiple Electricity Markets Design Undergoing Asymmetric Policies on Renewables Expansion: Capacity Adequacy and Revenue Sufficiency

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Locational marginal pricing‐based allocation of transmission capacity in multiple electricity markets

Cited by 14 publications

References 27 publications

Market‐based mechanism for multi‐area power exchange management in a multiple electricity market

Market‐based mechanism for multi‐area power exchange management in a multiple electricity market

Identification of the sharing contribution of the power supply system power sources to the electricity losses and their cost

Multiple Electricity Markets Design Undergoing Asymmetric Policies on Renewables Expansion: Capacity Adequacy and Revenue Sufficiency

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About