2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location and capacity allocations decisions to mitigate the impacts of unexpected disasters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e first stage included preposition of relief goods between storage areas according to forecasts, and the second stage was the response phase that includes distribution of relief goods between storage points and demand points. Paul and MacDonald [24] developed a stochastic model to determine the location and capacity of distribution centers in order to mitigate the impacts of disasters with (almost) no forewarning such as earthquakes. e objective function in the model was to minimize the sum of expected fatality costs, supply costs and the costs of building distribution centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e first stage included preposition of relief goods between storage areas according to forecasts, and the second stage was the response phase that includes distribution of relief goods between storage points and demand points. Paul and MacDonald [24] developed a stochastic model to determine the location and capacity of distribution centers in order to mitigate the impacts of disasters with (almost) no forewarning such as earthquakes. e objective function in the model was to minimize the sum of expected fatality costs, supply costs and the costs of building distribution centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such assumption may be too strict, especially for suddenly-occurring disasters like earthquakes. Actually, besides the uncertain demand, each disaster usually contains multiple sources of uncertainty, such as the magnitude of the disaster, the number of casualties, and the availability of rescue facilities, which should be considered when we design an efficient emergency plan [10]. It is worth noting that these factors are mutually interdependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fritz Institute [1] reported that lack of a system for monitoring and managing the relief aids in 2004 Southeast Asia tsunami led to large-scale shortages of relief items and medical personnel. The report discussed the main problems of the management of HRCs that motivated recent research studies to focus on facility location [2], relief items' allocation [3], and relief distribution/transportation issues [4]. These problems in the context of humanitarian supply chains are different from their counterparts in commercial supply chains in which, timeliness and effectiveness of relief operations are more important factors than cost [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passed time after earthquake (hours); 2 : Distributed relief items into the affected area (million);3 : The number of needed transportation mode e between CT and LT, In the first 12 hours, the average number of LTs that were setup by existing configuration is more than or equal to the number of LTs that was set up by the HDSS. Although, more LTs have been setup in the existing configuration in the first 12 hours, the RS and BT measures are comparable to HDSS configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%