2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr018967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally conservative groundwater flow in the continuous Galerkin method using 3‐D prismatic patches

Abstract: A new procedure has been developed to improve the velocity field computed by the continuous Galerkin finite element method (CG). It enables extending the postprocessing algorithm proposed by Cordes and Kinzelbach (1992) to three‐dimensional (3‐D) models by using prismatic patches for saturated groundwater flow. This approach leverages a dual mesh to preserve local mass conservation and provides interpolated velocities based on consistent fluxes. To develop this 3‐D approach, a triangular conservative patch is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need to calculate the internal flux often arises when detailed inflow/outflow components are to be examined at the subdomain level during the calibration and verification phase of modeling studies. On the other hand, an alternative postprocessing method that calculates the internal flux was developed by assuming that the flow field is irrotational [17][18][19][20]. The alternative postprocessing method subdivides elements into patches and individual fluxes for each patch are computed to calculate flow rates through each of the element faces such that flow through the boundary of any subdomain can be calculated by summing the flow rates at those faces that define the boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to calculate the internal flux often arises when detailed inflow/outflow components are to be examined at the subdomain level during the calibration and verification phase of modeling studies. On the other hand, an alternative postprocessing method that calculates the internal flux was developed by assuming that the flow field is irrotational [17][18][19][20]. The alternative postprocessing method subdivides elements into patches and individual fluxes for each patch are computed to calculate flow rates through each of the element faces such that flow through the boundary of any subdomain can be calculated by summing the flow rates at those faces that define the boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the pressure gradient and the velocity of the groundwater inrush in granular rock mass does not generally satisfy the Darcy equation, but a distinct nonlinear correlation [15,18], that is, non-Darcy flow Forchheimer equation [19]. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to establish a nonlinear flow model for the identification of seepage mechanisms and the reasonable prediction of groundwater inrush [20]. A nonlinear dynamic model of variable mass system for non-Darcy flow in granular rocks was established based on the mechanical plug in porous media [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al () enhanced the CK method (referred to hereafter as the ECK method) in a two‐dimensional (2‐D) domain by transforming the advection flux depending on various flux types, such as vertical infiltration, storage change, and wells. They also extended their ECK method to 3‐D models, which they termed the 3‐D prismatic patches (3DPP) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the CK method does not work on vertical infiltration, storage change, or threedimensional (3-D) elements, and the theory of Berger and Howington (2002) is limited to one dimension. Wu et al (2016) enhanced the CK method (referred to hereafter as the ECK method) in a two-dimensional (2-D) domain by transforming the advection flux depending on various flux types, such as vertical infiltration, storage change, and wells. They also extended their ECK method to 3-D models, which they termed the 3-D prismatic patches (3DPP) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation