2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12145627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Application of the Galerkin Finite Element Method with a Mass Conservation Scheme under Dirichlet Boundary Conditions to Solve Groundwater Problems

Abstract: The Galerkin finite element method (FEM) has long been used to solve groundwater flow equations and compute the mass balance in a region. In this study, we proposed a simple, new computational FEM procedure for global mass balance computations that can simultaneously obtain boundary fluxes at Dirichlet boundary nodes and finite element hydraulic heads at all nodes in only one step, whereas previous approaches usually require two steps. In previous approaches, the first step obtains the Galerkin finite element … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the experimental method and the numerical analysis method are mainly used for groundwater seepage in unsaturated soils [4]. Most of the traditional numerical methods for solving groundwater seepage problems are discretized by finite difference method [5], finite element method [6] to create meshes. Nevertheless, for complex study areas, such methods encounter the problem of difficult grid creation, and the problem boundary needs to be simplified to be analyzable [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the experimental method and the numerical analysis method are mainly used for groundwater seepage in unsaturated soils [4]. Most of the traditional numerical methods for solving groundwater seepage problems are discretized by finite difference method [5], finite element method [6] to create meshes. Nevertheless, for complex study areas, such methods encounter the problem of difficult grid creation, and the problem boundary needs to be simplified to be analyzable [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%