2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2009.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization refinement for wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this subsection, we simulate an improved localization algorithm named Taylor-LS for comparison and analyze the performance of ALE with different network connectivity [9]. We control the network connectivity by changing the transmission range while keeping the area of deployment the same.…”
Section: Impact Of Network Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this subsection, we simulate an improved localization algorithm named Taylor-LS for comparison and analyze the performance of ALE with different network connectivity [9]. We control the network connectivity by changing the transmission range while keeping the area of deployment the same.…”
Section: Impact Of Network Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the uncertainty of multihop distance measurements is also an important influence on localization accuracy [8][9][10][11]. Most of the existing approaches considered the distance measurements affected by the normal distribution noise and determined the distances uncertainty through Monte Carlo analysis or other conventional statistical techniques [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And then, the distance fitting is used to fit correct distance measurements, which makes the final estimated position out of the effect by the layout of anchor nodes. The authors in [5] proposed three multihop localization schemes based on least squares and multilateration, namely, Taylor-LS, weighted Taylor based least squares and constrained total least squares, respectively. Additionally, a generalized Cramér-Rao lower bound is developed to analyze the performance of multihop localization approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the large-scale UWSNs, this situation will no doubt result in a greater extra cost. Fortunately, multihop localization methods can elegantly handle this situation without any additional requirements [3][4][5][6][7]. With the multihop approach, the ordinary nodes not only can directly measure the distance by short-range communications, but canalso infer the distances to nonneighboring anchors through 2 International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks approximating the length of the shortest path to the Euclidean distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, three types of localization schemes are proposed for large-scale localization, namely, mobile anchor assisted localization algorithms [4][5][6], recursive algorithms [7][8][9], and multihop algorithms [10][11][12], respectively. Hereinto, mobile anchor assisted localization methods commonly employ some expensive mobile equipment such as Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) which can roam across the monitoring region to assist localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%