1988
DOI: 10.3171/jns.1988.68.5.0721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of dural fistulas using metrizamide digital subtraction fluoroscopic cisternography

Abstract: Demonstration of the exact site of dural fistulas in cases of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea is difficult. Previous reports have described the use of metrizamide cisternography combined with either hypocycloidal tomography or computerized tomography; however, direct, dynamic, real-time visualization of the fistula is difficult with instillation of a minimal dose of metrizamide using those methods. A digital video subtraction fluoroscopy system can visualize the actual site of the fistula directly and dynamical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early posttraumatic stage (Յ 3 months posttrauma) radiographic demonstration of an active CSF fistula by contrast-enhanced cisternography (CCG) was not helpful; this agrees with findings of other studies suggesting that the CCG may gradually be replaced by delineating the bone defect on coronal CT scanning. 27 Direct, dynamic real-time visualization of the fistula is difficult 18,25 unless the CSF leak occurs during the examination, 17 and digital subtraction used during the nondrip period may fail to reveal the site of the fistula. 3,27 However, compared with coronal CT scanning, CCG may be more helpful in the management of compound skull base fractures after the early posttraumatic stage.…”
Section: High-resolution Coronal Ct Scanning Compared With Other Imagmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the early posttraumatic stage (Յ 3 months posttrauma) radiographic demonstration of an active CSF fistula by contrast-enhanced cisternography (CCG) was not helpful; this agrees with findings of other studies suggesting that the CCG may gradually be replaced by delineating the bone defect on coronal CT scanning. 27 Direct, dynamic real-time visualization of the fistula is difficult 18,25 unless the CSF leak occurs during the examination, 17 and digital subtraction used during the nondrip period may fail to reveal the site of the fistula. 3,27 However, compared with coronal CT scanning, CCG may be more helpful in the management of compound skull base fractures after the early posttraumatic stage.…”
Section: High-resolution Coronal Ct Scanning Compared With Other Imagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, surgical decision making is primarily guided by whether the fracture is associated with persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea. 1,4,25 Rhinorrhea or tension pneumocele, however, can develop many (5-45) years after injury, 8,9,13,14,16,19,21,22 and a fatal attack of pneumococcal meningitis, without preced-ing CSF rhinorrhea, may be the first presentation of a posttraumatic fistula. 8 The reasons for poor healing in such cases are not fully understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital subtraction cisternography has been reported as a useful technique to identify intracranial CSF fistulas. [6][7][8] More recently, digital subtraction myelography was successfully used to localize the dural tear in the case of a high cervical postoperative pseudomeningocele. Fig 1. A, Sagittal T2-weighted (TR, 3300 msec; TE, 100.8 msec) image of the thoracic spine defines the caudal aspect of the epidural fluid collection at T6 -T7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescein dyes, 19 radioisotopes, 20 metrizamide digital video subtraction fluoroscopic cisternography, 21 and contrast CT cisternography, 20,22,23 have all been used to determine the location of CSF leak. The latter, however, has proved invaluable, and is the test of choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%