2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2953777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization and Throughput Trade-Off in a Multi-User Multi-Carrier mm-Wave System

Abstract: In this paper, we propose various localization error optimal beamforming strategies and subsequently study the trade-off between data and localization services while budgeting time and frequency resources in a multiuser millimeter-wave framework. Allocating more resources for the data service phase instead of localization would imply higher data rate but, concurrently, also a higher position and orientation estimation error. In order to characterize this trade-off, we firstly derive a flexible application-depe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Communication and localization are conventionally seen as competing for the same precious time-frequency resources, where reference signals used for localization take away resources used for communication. In that sense, one must trade off communication rate with localization accuracy [1], [2]. At the same time, it has been appreciated that location information is useful for communication [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication and localization are conventionally seen as competing for the same precious time-frequency resources, where reference signals used for localization take away resources used for communication. In that sense, one must trade off communication rate with localization accuracy [1], [2]. At the same time, it has been appreciated that location information is useful for communication [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the localization in mmwave communications has been considered in several papers, such as [28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. In detail, in [28], a three-step localization scheme was introduced, which includes the coarse channel estimation using the distributed compressed sensing simultaneous orthogonal matching pursuit (DCS-SOMP) algorithm, and the fine estimation using the space-alternating generalized expectationmaximization (SAGE) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], the fisher information matrix (FIM) and the position error bound (PEB) for a uniform rectangular array (URA) were derived. In [34], the FIM and the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) were derived for the multi-user multi-carrier systems, where a localization throughput trade-off was also derived. In [31], a joint received signal strength and angle of arrival (RSS-AOA) algorithm based on beamspace transformation was introduced to reduce the complexity of angle estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, G. Destino, et al [42]- [44], performed some important works by dividing a fixed communication duration into two separate time slots for localization and effective data transmission, respectively, and inquiring into the trade-off between the positioning quality and EADR. R. Koirala, et al [45], also studied the trade-off from the perspective of the time allocation, and formulated optimization problems to optimize the localization and EADR performances. G. Ghatak, et al [46], derived the CRLB for the estimation of the distance between a mobile user and its serving BS, and investigated the trade-off by allocating the total transmit power for the positioning and effective data transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%