1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.29.4167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization and interaction effects in ultrathin amorphous superconducting films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

16
143
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
16
143
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For v F ∼ 1.5 × 10 8 cm/sec, this rate corresponds to a mean free path of ∼ 0.3 nm. This value, while small, is consistent with other estimates and is much less than the thickness of the films [6]. Hence surface scattering is not important, R ∝ 1/d, and the normal-state conductivity does not depend on sheet resistance.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For v F ∼ 1.5 × 10 8 cm/sec, this rate corresponds to a mean free path of ∼ 0.3 nm. This value, while small, is consistent with other estimates and is much less than the thickness of the films [6]. Hence surface scattering is not important, R ∝ 1/d, and the normal-state conductivity does not depend on sheet resistance.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several transport experiments have revealed a sharp reduction in the superconducting transition temperature T c with increasing R , even in the weakly localized regime [6,7,8,9]. The suppression of T c has been attributed to localization and an increase in the Coulomb interaction [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data include NbN sets of films that were reported previously by other groups, each of which was reported to be in agreement with one of the models of the form T c (R s ) [17] or T c (d) [18,19]. Moreover, these data sets include some "classical" examples, such as the Bi films by Goldman et al [20], which were used for demonstrating a possible superconducting-to-insulating transition, and the homogeneous αMoGe films of Graybeal et al [46], which were used for demonstrating Finkel'stein's model [9]. The data and analysis of each of these materials are discussed in detail on a linear scale in the Supplemental Material [38] (e.g., a detailed analysis of αMoGe films is provided in section S7 in the Supplemental Material [38]).…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Unlike previous studies, 2,4 here we use fluorinated single-wall nanotubes (FSWNT), which are known to be insulating. 12 The substrate with suspended nanotubes was then sputtercoated 13 in one of two ways: (i) with amorphous 14 Mo 0.79 Ge 0.21 or (ii) with a slightly thinner amorphous Mo 0.79 Ge 0.21 film followed (in the same vacuum cycle) by a 2 nm Si film. Contact pads were defined using photolithography, followed by (i) wet etching in H 2 O 2 for MoGe or (ii) reactive ion etching followed by wet H 2 O 2 etching for Si-coated samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%