2013
DOI: 10.1287/moor.2013.0585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization and Exact Simulation of Brownian Motion-Driven Stochastic Differential Equations

Abstract: Generating sample paths of stochastic differential equations (SDE) using the Monte Carlo method finds wide applications in financial engineering. Discretization is a popular approximate approach to generating those paths: it is easy to implement but prone to simulation bias. This article presents a new simulation scheme to exactly generate samples for SDEs. The key observation is that the law of a general SDE can be decomposed into a product of the law of standard Brownian motion and the law of a doubly stocha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this section is to introduce two alternatives to discretization schemes, which allow us to eliminate the discretization error introduced by discretization schemes and to recover the Monte Carlo convergence rate. These alternatives are the exact simulation methods, due to Roberts and collaborators, see Beskos et al (2006), Beskos and Roberts (2005), and also Chen and Huang (2012b), and multilevel methods due to coauthors, see Giles (2008a, 2008b). We firstly provide a very brief introduction to Monte Carlo methods and then briefly illustrate the Euler discretization scheme, which motivates the exact simulation and multilevel methods.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this section is to introduce two alternatives to discretization schemes, which allow us to eliminate the discretization error introduced by discretization schemes and to recover the Monte Carlo convergence rate. These alternatives are the exact simulation methods, due to Roberts and collaborators, see Beskos et al (2006), Beskos and Roberts (2005), and also Chen and Huang (2012b), and multilevel methods due to coauthors, see Giles (2008a, 2008b). We firstly provide a very brief introduction to Monte Carlo methods and then briefly illustrate the Euler discretization scheme, which motivates the exact simulation and multilevel methods.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these samples are exact, then so are the samples of the T n . The methods of Beskos and Roberts (2005) and Chen (2009) can be used to generate exact samples of a broad range of diffusion processes n . The method of Giesecke and Smelov (2010) supplies exact samples of jump-diffusion processes.…”
Section: Conventional Acceptance/rejection Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inequality facilitates an acceptance-rejection algorithm to draw a sample of . A sample X from g · y is accepted as a sample of with probability p X y H ; X can be generated by the inverse method or the exact methods of Beskos and Roberts (2005) and Chen (2009). By the continuity and Markov property of the process ,…”
Section: Exact Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the recent approaches in this direction involve generating unbiased samples of g(X t,x T ) using the method of exact simulation by Beskos and Roberts (2005) and Chen and Huang (2013). Note that these schemes essentially handle one-dimensional situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%