1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2760(19990605)21:5<343::aid-mop11>3.0.co;2-o
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Local transparent boundary condition applied to the modeling of tropospheric ducting propagation
Abstract: An efficient numerical scheme to simulate tropospheric ducting propagation (TDP) is presented in this paper. This scheme solves the parabolic equation (PE) approximation in conjunction with the finite‐element method (FEM) and the local transparent boundary condition (LTBC). It is shown that a simple LTBC can be effectively used to account for the radiation in TDP, instead of the recently published nonlocal transparent boundary condition (NTBC), which is much more complex and consumes more computer time. ©1999 …
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
8
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
1
0
0
Year Published
2000
2018
Publication Types
Select...
8
1
Relationship
1
8
Authors
Journals
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
References 11 publications
0
1
0
0
“…So far, the three commonly used algorithms of PE are SSFT, the finite-difference method (FDM) [5], and the finite-element method (FEM) [6], among which SSFT is an analytical method, while FDM and FEM are numerical methods. In terms of the problem of propagation in the troposphere under large-scene, long-distance, and low-elevation angle conditions, SSFT has many advantages over FDM and FEM, such as good in stability, small in error, and high in efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the three commonly used algorithms of PE are SSFT, the finite-difference method (FDM) [5], and the finite-element method (FEM) [6], among which SSFT is an analytical method, while FDM and FEM are numerical methods. In terms of the problem of propagation in the troposphere under large-scene, long-distance, and low-elevation angle conditions, SSFT has many advantages over FDM and FEM, such as good in stability, small in error, and high in efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
