2004
DOI: 10.1002/mop.20314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parabolic‐equation‐based study of ducting effects on microwave propagation

Abstract: This work reports a quantitative assessment of propagation losses for the frequency band 2110–2170 MHz under evaporation and surface‐based ducts conditions. Flat‐underlying‐surface and elevated‐terrain cases are studied. The calculations are based on the parabolic approximation to the wave equation in conjunction with finite‐element and Fourier split‐step techniques. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 42: 390–394, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, propagation calculations and measurements have shown this neutral profile is a good practical approximation to the average behavior of the M (z) [30] and (16) has been widely used as input to propagation modeling under evaporation duct conditions [7,8,14,17,30]. Further discussion on the profile (16) may be found in [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, propagation calculations and measurements have shown this neutral profile is a good practical approximation to the average behavior of the M (z) [30] and (16) has been widely used as input to propagation modeling under evaporation duct conditions [7,8,14,17,30]. Further discussion on the profile (16) may be found in [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ducting is present for small percent of time but it seriously influences the radar [3,4] and communications systems [5][6][7][8] working in the microwave range: the rays' bending under ducting differs from that for standard troposphere and provokes erroneous precipitation detection by ground-based meteorological radars, the electromagnetic energy trapping within the ducts leads to trans-horizon signal propagation, reflections from upper refractive layers cause mulipath fading, etc. Depending on the physical mechanism of their formation, the tropospheric ducts are subdivided in different types -here we are interested in evaporation ducts for which the negative gradient of M is due to evaporation from large bodies of water [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics behind this profile, based on the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory, is explained elsewhere [7,108,109]. As indicated by Paulus and Anderson [111], (20) is a good practical approximation to the average M( ) profile, and has been widely used as input to the PE propagation model applied under evaporation duct conditions [27,33,40,73,97,[111][112][113][114][115]. Equation (20), however, has been obtained assuming thermally neutral troposphere stratification and does not account for the tropospheric stability effects on the M profile [7,29,33].…”
Section: Modeling Of the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PE uses meteorological parameters as input, allows application of complex boundary conditions and inclusion of different antenna patterns. Due to these characteristics and the demonstrated operability, the PE has become a preferred method for solving microwave propagation prediction/assessment problems requiring simultaneous accounting for terrain irregularities and clear air propagation mechanisms such as tropospheric ducting [16,27,29,31,32,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. The goal of this work is to summarize the PE method theory and its application to tropospheric radio propagation modeling in coastal and maritime environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ducting may also affect radio communications links [4,5], or falsely extend the apparent radar range of a target on or near the sea surface [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%