Local-To-Global Hypotheses for Robust Robot Localization

Abstract

Many robust state-of-the-art localization methods rely on pose-space sample sets that are evaluated against individual sensor measurements. While these methods can work effectively, they often provide limited mechanisms to control the amount of hypotheses based on their similarity. Furthermore, they do not explicitly use associations to create or remove these hypotheses. We propose a global localization strategy that allows a mobile robot to localize using explicit symbolic associations with annotated geometric features. The feature measurements are first combined locally to form a consistent local feature map that is accurate in the vicinity of the robot. Based on this local map, an association tree is maintained that pairs local map features with global map features. The leaves of the tree represent distinct hypotheses on the data associations that allow for globally unmapped features appearing in the local map. We propose a registration step to check if an association hypothesis is supported. Our implementation considers a robot equipped with a 2D LiDAR and we compare the proposed method to a particle filter. We show that maintaining a smaller set of data association hypotheses results in better performance and explainability of the robot’s assumptions, as well as allowing more control over hypothesis bookkeeping. We provide experimental evaluations with a physical robot in a real environment using an annotated geometric building model that contains only the static part of the indoor scene. The result shows that our method outperforms a particle filter implementation in most cases by using fewer hypotheses with more descriptive power.

BIM-SLAM: Integrating BIM Models in Multi-session SLAM for Lifelong Mapping using 3D LiDAR

“…In their factor graph-based localization approach, the system queries semantic objects in its surroundings (lines, corners, and circles) and creates data associations between them and the laser measurements. More recently, in [10], they improved and evaluated their method for global localization, achieving better results against AMCL.…”