2014
DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-6827-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local spatial structure of forest biomass and its consequences for remote sensing of carbon stocks

Abstract: Advances in forest carbon mapping have the potential to greatly reduce uncertainties in the global carbon budget and to facilitate effective emissions mitigation strategies such as REDD+. Though broad scale mapping is based primarily on remote sensing data, the accuracy of resulting forest carbon stock estimates depends critically on the quality of field measurements and calibration procedures. The mismatch in spatial scales between field inventory plots and larger pixels of current and planned remote sensing … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the largest expected AGB change between the field surveys and the radar data acquisition was 68 t.ha − 1 . However, note that the oldest inventories, which were conducted in IFB, were located on poor sandy soils characterized by a pool of species with higher wood density and lower growth rates (Fayolle et al, 2012;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2014). Thus, the largest AGB change of 68 t.ha −1 is unlikely to occur in that area.…”
Section: Reduction Of the Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the largest expected AGB change between the field surveys and the radar data acquisition was 68 t.ha − 1 . However, note that the oldest inventories, which were conducted in IFB, were located on poor sandy soils characterized by a pool of species with higher wood density and lower growth rates (Fayolle et al, 2012;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2014). Thus, the largest AGB change of 68 t.ha −1 is unlikely to occur in that area.…”
Section: Reduction Of the Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We discarded the upscaled plots that contained less than two 0.5-ha field plots. The remaining upscaled plots contained a mean field plot size of 2.1 ± 0.6 ha and were all ≥ 1 ha, which may correspond to an AGB estimation sampling error less than 17% according to Réjou-Méchain et al (2014). Then, we attempted to optimize the representativeness of the ground information in the whole 1-km pixels and selected the pixels that were likely to contain homogeneous forests.…”
Section: Reduction Of the Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining forest structure parameters from stand level estimates with extensive forest cover maps derived from remote sensing have been shown to have the potential for providing reasonable biomass estimates at local, regional and global level [13,14]. However, from stand level AGB estimates to wall-to-wall extrapolation using different satellite data, the assessment of carbon stocks or AGB for tropical forests is still spoilt by uncertainty [15] thus weakening the results at regional scales. One of the major reasons for uncertainty in AGB estimates from most medium to high spatial resolution space-borne optical and radar platforms is the saturation of remote sensing signals at fairly low levels of biomass (150-200 Mg·ha −1 ), far below the upper range of values found in tropical forests (>500 Mg·ha −1 ) [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, local forest biomass estimations commonly represent the foundation for the calibration and validation of remote sensing models. As a consequence, uncertainties and errors in local biomass estimations may propagate dramatically to broad-scale forest carbon stock assessment (Avitabile et al, 2011;Pelletier et al, 2011;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2014). Aboveground biomass (AGB) is the major pool of biomass in tropical forests (Eggleston et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%