2014
DOI: 10.4171/ifb/317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local solvability and turning for the inhomogeneous Muskat problem

Abstract: In this work we study the evolution of the free boundary between two different fluids in a porous medium where the permeability is a two dimensional step function. The medium can fill the whole plane R 2 or a bounded strip S = R × (−π/2, π/2). The system is in the stable regime if the denser fluid is below the lighter one. First, we show local existence in Sobolev spaces by means of energy method when the system is in the stable regime. Then we prove the existence of curves such that they start in the stable r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, as noted in [2], (at the time) it is(was) an open problem as to whether the problem is well-posed for initial data with a cusp. Theorem 3.1 was proved by Córdoba & Gancedo [32] using energy methods (a similar result for the case where the spatial domain is a strip, for the case of a porous medium with two different permeabilities and for the case of three fluids was proved by Córdoba, Granero-Belinchón and Orive [34] and Berselli, Córdoba and Granero-Belinchón [6] and Córdoba & Gancedo [36], respectively). A different proof (using a formulation for (1.6) based on the tangent angle and arclength) was given by Ambrose [2,1] (see also [96]).…”
Section: Well-posednessmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually, as noted in [2], (at the time) it is(was) an open problem as to whether the problem is well-posed for initial data with a cusp. Theorem 3.1 was proved by Córdoba & Gancedo [32] using energy methods (a similar result for the case where the spatial domain is a strip, for the case of a porous medium with two different permeabilities and for the case of three fluids was proved by Córdoba, Granero-Belinchón and Orive [34] and Berselli, Córdoba and Granero-Belinchón [6] and Córdoba & Gancedo [36], respectively). A different proof (using a formulation for (1.6) based on the tangent angle and arclength) was given by Ambrose [2,1] (see also [96]).…”
Section: Well-posednessmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The previous result was given by Constantin, Córdoba, Gancedo & Strain [23] (see also [6,20]). Although the solution enjoys this decay of the relatively strong L ∞ norm and a energy balance that controls the velocity in L 2 (0, ∞; L 2 (R 2 )), this is not enough to obtain a global existence result of any kind.…”
Section: Well-posednessmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The main questions that we do not address here are• The case of surface tension or jump in permeability (see e.g. [46,47,9,37,51]). This can also be covered by the paradifferential formalism, but we decided to leave it for another work in order to highlight the centrality of the Dirichlet-Neumann operator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting scenarios consider 3D fluids, multiphase flows, boundary effects or permeability discontinuities (see for example [5,43]), etc. Different methods interact, raging from analytic to computerassisted proofs [38].…”
Section: Mathematical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework picked in this presentation allows us to reduce the problem from its original Eulerian variables formulation (eqs. (1,2,3,4,5)) to the self-evolution of an interface, hence the name contour evolution equation. It provides a simple way to linearize the system of equations to illustrate in a non-technical manner what is going on at the nonlinear level.…”
Section: Contour Evolution Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%