Local security policies and the protection of territory: an analysis of the Italian experience (2007-2009)

Abstract

This paper explores the territorial dimension of local security policies, with reference to the "Security Pacts" signed in Italy between 2007 and 2009. These Security Pacts are an innovative instrument introduced by the central government, aimed at changing the model of security governance at the local level. After describing how Security Pacts have spread, and which institutional actors have participated in them, this study aims at deepening the analysis of their territorial dimension. More specifically, the research question at the basis of this study focuses on the identification of factors that can explain why the pacts feature variations in numbers and types of public administration at different levels, and why they tend to acquire particular spatial configurations rather than others. Three hypotheses are tested based on empirical data (obtained using a Quantitative Narrative Analysis with the aid of Geographic Information Systems and other statistical tools) used to identify which variable may best explain the propensity to use such pacts to solve security-related issues in different areas of the country.

Prohibicionismo suave para abordar el trabajo sexual callejero: ordenanzas cívicas y ley mordaza

“…Entre las razones para adoptarlas se apeló a la emergencia de nuevos problemas, aparecidos durante los años anteriores a su aprobación masiva, vinculados al uso vecinal de espacios públicos que carecían de respuesta legal, como el botellón, o a la agravación de problemas tradicionales, como la prostitución callejera (Pemán, 2007;Gracia, 2008). No cabe duda de que la percepción de la inseguridad frente a las conductas incívicas y la asunción por parte del gobierno local de la emisión de normas orientadas a su tutela es común a nuestro país y a otros del occidente europeo, como Italia (Selmini, 2012;Calaresu y Tebaldi, 2015) o Gran Bretaña (Hugues y Edwards, 2005). Sin embargo, en España este proceso se explica además por la paulatina retirada del legislador estatal de las cuestiones relacionadas con el orden público desde los años 90 (Pemán, 2007;Ortega, 2014).…”

Roma as victims of hate crimes: Contemporary context (the case of Italy)

“…Tako se, na primer, 66% pripadnika romske populacije izjasnilo da je diskriminisano, što je posle Češke (74%) i Grčke (68%) najveći procenat diskriminacije u odnosu na ostale zemlje iz istraživanja. 2 Ulaskom Rumunije u Evropsku uniju 1. januara 2007. godine, svi njeni građani su stekli pravo na slobodu kretanja u državama Evropske unije, te je veliki broj Roma, državljana Rumunije, emigrirao u Italiju. 3 Povećanje obima kriminaliteta tokom 2006. i 2007. godine u Italiji mnogi nacionalni i lokalni politički lideri objašnjavali su činjenicom nekontrolisanog ulaska emigranata u Italiju, za koje su isticali da su krivi za povećanje broja izvršenih krivičnih dela.…”

Why European mayors emphasize urban security: Evidence from a survey in 28 European countries

“…To analyse this new urban politics around the issue of security, a broad range of notions have emerged at the intersection between political discourse and academic analysis: public order, local safety, public security, and crime prevention, often used interchangeably (see, on the discussion, Calaresu, 2017; Edwards and Hughes, 2005). In this article, we will primarily refer to the notion of ‘urban security’, because it has come ‘to express a number of key tensions, if not contradictions in European thinking about crime and violence – between the importance of prevention and sanctioning as policy priorities established by “active citizens” as well as scientific and political elites’ (Edwards et al, 2013: 265).…”