2016
DOI: 10.1093/afraf/adw040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local security and the (un)making of public authority in Gulu, Northern Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Many respondents suggested that this helps the government maintain plausible deniability of their relationship to auxiliary forces, such that NRM politicians can claim credit when auxiliary security actors such as crime preventers do good work and disown them if they are caught committing crimes, such as tampering with the election. 39 Shifting logics: political, economic, and social…”
Section: Creating the Crime Preventersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Many respondents suggested that this helps the government maintain plausible deniability of their relationship to auxiliary forces, such that NRM politicians can claim credit when auxiliary security actors such as crime preventers do good work and disown them if they are caught committing crimes, such as tampering with the election. 39 Shifting logics: political, economic, and social…”
Section: Creating the Crime Preventersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What happens in the village is not of concern, so long as it is not organized violent crime or resistance to the government. Although security groups are framed as local responses to local problems, the government retains the right to intervene and police their activities, frequently making arrests in relation to groups’ night patrols, the degree of force they employ and the appropriateness of their involvement in interpersonal conflicts (Tapscott, ).…”
Section: The Government's Long Handsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What happens in the village is not of concern, so long as it is not organized violent crime or resistance to the government. Although security groups are framed as local responses to local problems, the government retains the right to intervene and police their activities, frequently making arrests in relation to groups' night patrols, the degree of force they employ and the appropriateness of their involvement in interpersonal conflicts (Tapscott, 2016 The authority of local security initiatives is further destabilized as the government encourages the formation of non-formal security arrangements on the one hand and disowns them on the other. Officials in the administration, as well as police authorities and appointed sub-county security officers (Gombolola Internal Security Officers or GISO) have repeatedly advocated for the formation of community security groups at community meetings, fully expecting that the groups will use physical punishment and make arrests and saying as much in village meetings.…”
Section: Destabilizing the Local: An Unpredictable Institutional Envimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many were poorly treated, receiving little to no pay, and placed on the frontlines (Omach, , p. 440). This policy of engaging civilians in security provision continues today: civilian youths frequently are tasked with policing their communities under the guidance of local leaders (Tapscott, ). For its part, the LRA relied on guerrilla tactics, abducting an estimated 60,000–80,000 people in the Acholi sub‐region (Annan et al, , p. 883) .…”
Section: The Militarisation Of the State And Society Under The Nrmmentioning
confidence: 99%