2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00348-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local permeate flux–shear–pressure relationships in a rotating disk microfiltration module: implications for global performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results are divided into two parts; one was with lower rotation speed (2,4,8,16, 24, 32, 40 rad/s) and another with higher rotation speed (50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250 rad/s). Time step of 0.00005 s and the computational time of 1 s were used for all simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results are divided into two parts; one was with lower rotation speed (2,4,8,16, 24, 32, 40 rad/s) and another with higher rotation speed (50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250 rad/s). Time step of 0.00005 s and the computational time of 1 s were used for all simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) and also membrane fouling in microfiltration (MF) has been proven can be reduced by high shear rate [1]. The back transport of macromolecules or solute that concentrated on the membrane surface can be improved by high membrane surface shear rate [2] and thus prevent concentration polarization [3] and cake layer buildup [4]. Dynamic membrane filtration system has been introduced to increase the membrane surface shear rate by moving parts of the membrane system such as rotating disk filtration and vibration shear enhanced process (VSEP) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] The design and configuration of the USD device reported here were sufficiently different to warrant establishing a correlation specific for this device, and CFD simulations were used for this purpose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors describe, for example, rotating [39] or vibrating [40,41] membrane modules, the addition of external forces such as ultrasound [42] or membrane surface modification [43][44][45][46] to reduce fouling at the membrane surface and to improve the flux in (pressure driven) (micro)filtration processes. Although the driving force for the membrane process described in this paper is a concentration difference instead of pressure, and thus different causes of fouling will decrease the flux of certain components through the membrane, it is interesting to investigate the above mentioned concepts in a fermentation process.…”
Section: Optimization Of In Situ Pertractionmentioning
confidence: 99%