2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local null controllability for degenerate parabolic equations with nonlocal term

Abstract: We establish a local null controllability result for following the nonlinear parabolic equation:where b(x, r) = (r)a(x) is a function with separated variables that defines an operator which degenerates at x = 0 and has a nonlocal term. Our approach relies on an application of Liusternik's inverse mapping theorem that demands the proof of a suitable Carleman estimate.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 35K65, 93B05; Secondary 35K55.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• In the system (1.1), we can replace each nonlinearity f i (t, x, u, v) by f i (t, x, u, v, u x , v x ), with i ∈ {1, 2}, in order to analyse whether it is possible to prove results about null controllability. • Previously, in [13], we have obtained a local null controlability result for degenarate parabolic equations with nonlocal tems, which implies, throughout standard arguments, a local null boundary controllability result. However, the same fact can not be directly deduced for systems with a reduced number of controls, see [6].…”
Section: Some Additional Commentsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…• In the system (1.1), we can replace each nonlinearity f i (t, x, u, v) by f i (t, x, u, v, u x , v x ), with i ∈ {1, 2}, in order to analyse whether it is possible to prove results about null controllability. • Previously, in [13], we have obtained a local null controlability result for degenarate parabolic equations with nonlocal tems, which implies, throughout standard arguments, a local null boundary controllability result. However, the same fact can not be directly deduced for systems with a reduced number of controls, see [6].…”
Section: Some Additional Commentsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…where a satisfies assumption A.1, c ∈ L ∞ ((0, T )×(0, 1)), F ∈ L 2 ((0, T )×(0, 1)) and ξ T ∈ L 2 (0, 1). The following Carleman estimate, proved in [13], holds for the solution to (2.5):…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to do that they choose a suitable weight function that change of sign inside the control domain. Following this ideas, in [3,4], the authors extended their Carleman Inequality for a general a = a(x) satisfying hypotheses (3.3), but just for the weak case, and proved a null-controllability result for a degenerate problem with nonlocal nonlinearities. The aim of the present work is extend the Carleman Inequality proved in [3] to the strong case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%