2004
DOI: 10.1081/agb-120027977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Near-Rings and Triply Factorized Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it was shown in [5] that if R is a local nearring with identity 1 and L R is the subgroup of all non-invertible elements of R, then the set 1+L R is a subgroup of the multiplicative group R * of R acting on L R by left multiplication, so that the semidirect product L R (1+L R ) is a group of the form G = AB = AM = BM with a normal subgroup M and subgroups A and B such that M is isomorphic to L R and A and B are isomorphic to 1 + L R . Thus in many cases the study of local nearrings can be reduced to that of groups of this form, so called triply factorized groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In particular, it was shown in [5] that if R is a local nearring with identity 1 and L R is the subgroup of all non-invertible elements of R, then the set 1+L R is a subgroup of the multiplicative group R * of R acting on L R by left multiplication, so that the semidirect product L R (1+L R ) is a group of the form G = AB = AM = BM with a normal subgroup M and subgroups A and B such that M is isomorphic to L R and A and B are isomorphic to 1 + L R . Thus in many cases the study of local nearrings can be reduced to that of groups of this form, so called triply factorized groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Theorem 12.2(Hubert 2004 [60] ). Let R be a nearring with identity element and U an admissable subgroup of R. Let N + be a normal subgroup of U + with (U + 1)N ⊆ N .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[5], [10], [14], [15]). The reason that a classification of the plenty of such near-rings is not possible can be found in the fact that already the determination of sharply 2-transitive abstract groups remains without reach (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%