2013
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.82.094601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Lattice Distortion Caused by Short Range Charge Ordering in LiMn2O4

Abstract: We have performed powder neutron diffraction on 7 Li-enriched sample of LiMn 2 O 4 at 300 K. The crystal structure determined by Rietveld analysis is a cubic spinel with space group of Fd " 3m in which all Mn atoms are crystallograghically equivalent, consistent with many preceding studies. However, the atomic pair distribution function (PDF) of this compound can not be fitted by the cubic structure with space group of Fd " 3m satisfactorily, and it can be reproduced by the orthorhombic structure with Fddd. It… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The invariable i‐1 pair corresponds to the cation‐oxygen bonds, which suggests that they are the unchanged structural units in the lattice cell and not responsible for the evolution of the global lattice parameters (see Figure S2, Supporting Information). Specifically, the constant MnO and NiO bond lengths are not influenced by the varied TM arrangement, which not only refutes the Fd3true¯m model but also rules out the formation of Mn 3+ , as the latter should produce a shoulder or broadening at the negative MnO peak due to the larger trivalent ions and a decrease of the TMO population due to the compensatory oxygen vacancy. Therefore, the PDF data do not support the hypothesis of cation rearrangement as a function of the Mn 3+ concentration, although very small amount of Mn 3+ might preexist in the starting material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The invariable i‐1 pair corresponds to the cation‐oxygen bonds, which suggests that they are the unchanged structural units in the lattice cell and not responsible for the evolution of the global lattice parameters (see Figure S2, Supporting Information). Specifically, the constant MnO and NiO bond lengths are not influenced by the varied TM arrangement, which not only refutes the Fd3true¯m model but also rules out the formation of Mn 3+ , as the latter should produce a shoulder or broadening at the negative MnO peak due to the larger trivalent ions and a decrease of the TMO population due to the compensatory oxygen vacancy. Therefore, the PDF data do not support the hypothesis of cation rearrangement as a function of the Mn 3+ concentration, although very small amount of Mn 3+ might preexist in the starting material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is noted that the local distortion of MnO 6 and NiO 6 octahedra persists throughout the crystal although Mn 3+ is almost eliminated by Ni substitution. It implies a different picture of the local structure from those arising from the Jahn–Teller distortion of MnO 6 or the Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ charge ordering in LiMn 2 O 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strong interaction between spin and lattice degrees of freedom, and associated charged and/or orbital ordering has also been observed in similar spinel compounds in low temperature range leading to magnetic and/or structural phase transition [52][53]. Nevertheless, our study shows a width, respectively at absolute zero temperature, and ph ph   corresponds to phonon-phonon coupling parameter.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of Phonon Modessupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The models of ideal cubic spinel at room temperature and the orthorhombic structure below 10 °C have also been confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction . A combined approach of Rietveld refinement and pair distribution function refinement for neutron diffraction data of LiMn 2 O 4 reveals that the orthorhombic structure is already present at room temperature in the form of a short‐range ordering . Cooling of the sample induces the expected transformation to an orthorhombic state with a long‐range ordering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%