Local knowledge, know‐how and knowledge mobilized in a globalized world: A new approach of indigenous local ecological knowledge

Abstract

More than 30 years after the 1988 Declaration of Belém, which we can consider an important outcome of socio‐environmental movements, this reflexive paper proposes new ways of approaching indigenous local knowledge (ILK) related to the living environment and understanding its relevance in times of global socio‐environmental crisis. Drawing upon the example of an ethnodevelopment project based on guarana production by indigenous Sateré‐Mawé people in the Brazilian Amazon, two important issues are addressed. First, we reflect on how a traditional management system can contribute to both biological and cultural conservation, even when that system is inserted in new global markets and spoken about through a scientific perspective. Second, we address the challenge of incorporating ILK into conservation research by formulating a set of methodological proposals. We show that ILK is a dynamic, adaptive and political product of local–global interactions. This leads us to defend an analysis of ILK that would focus on its processes of creation rather than on the body of knowledge that results from them, thus helping to account for ILK's vitality and the various forms of its legitimation. At the crossroads of ethnobiology, science and technology studies, and social anthropology, these research methods seek to go beyond the inventory, categorization and structural analysis of thoughts and practices to instead privilege an analysis of the interactions between local populations and resources; at the same time, they operate across different scales and integrate actors from the beginning to the end of (sometimes long) value chains. Such an approach aims to make visible the modes of knowledge translation and hybridization that indigenous people might implement to maintain control over their collective identities and their relationship with a changing environment. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Traditional food or biocultural threat? Concerns about the use of tilapia fish in Indigenous cuisine in the Amazonia of Ecuador

“…This finding supports previous studies in the region that report Indigenous organizations using their traditional knowledge to shape the dynamic on how economic development and global markets (e.g. tourism and agribusinesses) interact with their traditional food systems (Congretel & Pinton, 2020;Coq-Huelva et al, 2018;Sidali et al, 2016).…”

Congruence of local ecological knowledge (LEK)‐based methods and line‐transect surveys in estimating wildlife abundance in tropical forests

“…Line‐transect surveys are based on theoretical scientific knowledge, characterized by being systematic, controlled and based on hypotheses; which provides objectivity, verifiability, and, when properly applied, precision and accuracy (Rodríguez & Pérez, 2017). On the other hand, LEK arises from day‐to‐day practices and empirical knowledge embedded within specific worldviews beyond the nature/culture divide (Congretel & Pinton, 2020; Rodríguez & Pérez, 2017). LEK has direct practical applications and is considered more inductive and tacit (Congretel & Pinton, 2020).…”

Exploring farmers' agrobiodiversity management practices and knowledge in clove agroforests of Madagascar

“…Multiscale studies have revealed the role of indigenous perceptions and beliefs in the way local communities control soil erosion and fertility, manage land use and forest regeneration in secondary fallows (Barrera-Bassols et al, 2006;Carrière, 2002). All these studies emphasise how studying local knowledge of plants species helps understand human/nature interactions, and why such knowledge play a critical role in the resilience of socio-ecological systems (Congretel & Pinton, 2020;Folke, 2004).…”