Congruence of local ecological knowledge (LEK)‐based methods and line‐transect surveys in estimating wildlife abundance in tropical forests

Abstract

Effective estimation of wildlife population abundance is an important component of population monitoring, and ultimately essential for the development of conservation actions. Diurnal line‐transect surveys are one of the most applied methods for abundance estimations. Local ecological knowledge (LEK) is empirically acquired through the observation of ecological processes by local people. LEK‐based methods have only been recognized as valid scientific methods for surveying fauna abundance in the last three decades. However, the agreement between both methods has not been extensively analysed. We compared concomitant abundance data for 91 wild species (mammals, birds and tortoises) from diurnal line transects (9,221 km of trails) and a LEK‐based method (291 structured interviews) at 18 sites in Central and Western Amazonia. We used biological and socioecological factors to assess the agreements and divergences between abundance indices obtained from both methods. We found a significant agreement of population abundance indices for diurnal and game species. This relationship was also positive regardless of species sociality (solitary or social), body size and locomotion mode (terrestrial and arboreal); and of sampled forest type (upland and flooded forests). Conversely, we did not find significant abundance covariances for nocturnal and non‐game species. Despite the general agreement between methods, line transects were not effective at surveying many species occurring in the area, with 40.2% and 39.8% of all species being rarely and never detected in at least one of the survey sites. On the other hand, these species were widely reported by local informants to occur at intermediate to high abundances. Although LEK‐based methods have been long neglected by ecologists, our comparative study demonstrated their effectiveness for estimating vertebrate abundance of a wide diversity of taxa and forest environments. This can be used simultaneously with line‐transect surveys to calibrate abundance estimates and record species that are rarely sighted during surveys on foot, but that are often observed by local people during their daily extractive activities. Thus, the combination of local and scientific knowledge is a potential tool to improve our knowledge of tropical forest species and foster the development of effective strategies to meet biodiversity conservation goals.

Assessing factors influencing students’ perceptions towards animal species conservation

“…To examine the effects of student gender, age, income and knowledge area on the level of agreement with each sentence we performed a set of cumulative link mixed model (CLMM). We used CLMM because the data of the level of agreement are ordinal, ranging from 1 (completely desagree) to 5 (completely agree) ( Braga-Pereira et al, 2022 ). We performed five different models associated with each perception category.…”

Understanding anthropogenic impacts on zoogeochemistry is essential for ecological restoration

“…First, indigenous knowledge can enhance understanding of past histories of human–wildlife relationships (Trisos et al 2021), providing insights into long‐term impacts on zoogeochemistry (Doughty et al 2013). Second, traditional ecological knowledge can often provide accurate assessments of key information such as wildlife abundance and movement patterns (Braga‐Pereira et al 2022), which can be used in concert with, or in place of empirical data. For example, large vertebrate animals, such as bison ( Bison bison ), play a crucial role in several indigenous cultures, that have intimate knowledge of their ecology (Taschereau Mamers 2020).…”

Consumption and Preferences for Wild and Domestic Meat in Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

“…The traditional knowledge of indigenous people across the globe has played a key role in identifying living organisms that are endowed with nutritional and medicinal values important for humans. These traditional human societies have accumulated a vast store of knowledge about animals through the centuries, and this zoological knowledge is an important part of our human cultural heritage (Kendie et al, 2018;Braga-Pereira et al, 2021b).…”