2019
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2019.2891416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Feature Descriptor and Derivative Filters for Blind Image Quality Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent approaches use local feature detectors to find regions in an image that are drawn by the HVS and then transform a set of descriptors assigned to them to a vector used for the quality prediction . However, their color‐based statistics or data‐driven filters may lead to inferior performance regarding MR images due to lack of color information, the inappropriateness of optimal filtering determined for natural images, or presence of unseen distortion types . To the best knowledge of the authors, local features have not been considered in the MR‐IQA literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recent approaches use local feature detectors to find regions in an image that are drawn by the HVS and then transform a set of descriptors assigned to them to a vector used for the quality prediction . However, their color‐based statistics or data‐driven filters may lead to inferior performance regarding MR images due to lack of color information, the inappropriateness of optimal filtering determined for natural images, or presence of unseen distortion types . To the best knowledge of the authors, local features have not been considered in the MR‐IQA literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was compared with the following 21 state‐of‐the‐art NR techniques with publicly available sourcecode: BRISQUE, NOREQI, BPRI, IL‐NIQE, HOSA, GWHGLBP, ORACLE, RATER, SCORER, QENI, GM‐LOG, SISBLIM, metricQ, SSEQ, S‐INDEX, NFERM, SEER, DEEPIQ, MEON, WaDIQaM‐NR, and SNRTOI . The NOREQI, BPRI, ORACLE, RATER, QENI, and SCORER are the most similar to NOMRIQA since they employ local features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, changes in natural statistical characteristics can be manifested in many ways; for instance, in [12], in the spatial domain, the regional mutual information of different subsets was calculated based on information lost due to distortion to predict the quality scores. Oszust [13] converted the RGB image into the YCbCr color space to extract the local features from the key points. Liu et al [14] extracted the statistical measurements from three representative aspects of structure, naturalness, and perception to unsupervised learning.…”
Section: B Nr-iqa Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, image quality assessment (IQA) metrics can be categorized into the full-reference (FR), reduced-reference (RR) and blind/no-reference methods. FR-IQA metrics need all the information of the original image, RR-IQA metrics only need part information of the original image, while blind IQA (BIQA) metrics predicate the image quality without any reference information [6]. For FR-IQA metrics, some classic metrics were proposed for ordinary 2D images, such as peak signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM) [7] and visual information fidelity (VIF) [8], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%