1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf02560156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local excision of cancer of the rectum

Abstract: Local excision of rectal cancer can be a part of treatment of this tumor. The authors do not feel that this procedure is only palliative. Clinical staging I and II, tumor diameter less than 3 cm, malignancy grade 1 or 2, invasion no deeper than the submucosa, and no signet-cell carcinoma are all requisites for limited, local excision of rectal carcinoma. Patients operated upon under these criteria have a five-year survival rate of 89.6 +/- 21.7 per cent for those with invasion into the submucosa and 78 +/- 49.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Morson [12], reported that only 12% of tumors with incomplete wall penetration presented with positive lymph nodes. Based on this report and others [13][14][15][16][17], it has been suggested that local excision can safely be performed on tumors that do not exhibit complete wall penetration or are poorly differentiated. Some investigators have included a size restriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morson [12], reported that only 12% of tumors with incomplete wall penetration presented with positive lymph nodes. Based on this report and others [13][14][15][16][17], it has been suggested that local excision can safely be performed on tumors that do not exhibit complete wall penetration or are poorly differentiated. Some investigators have included a size restriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some investigators have included a size restriction. Biggers et al [14] and Hager et al [17], recommended the use of local therapy only for lesions measuring 3 cm or less, while Gingold et al [18], in reviewing the results of local therapy with electrofulguration, broadened this criteria to include tumors up to 4 cm. This recommendation has been generally accepted despite the fact that Greaney and associates found no relationship between tumor size and lymphatic involvement [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nur vereinzelte Publikationen berichteten über güns-tige Ergebnisse der LE in der Behandlung des Rektumkarzinoms. Nach LE von T1-Tumoren konnten Fünfjahres-überlebensraten von 82% (Patienten: n=143 [28]), 84% (n=86 [6]) und 90% (n=39 [12]) beobachtet werden, nach LE von T2-Tumoren 78% (n=20 [12]). …”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Diese klinischen Erfahrungen, gepaart mit detaillierten histopathologischen Untersuchungen, machten die Notwendigkeit strikter Selektionskriterien für die Indikation zur LE mit kurativer Intention deutlich [12]. Denn erst durch die histopathologische Bestäti-gung wird die in kurativer Absicht durchgeführte lokale Exzision zur adäquaten onkologischen Therapie eines Rektumkarzinoms.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The investigation is based on 499 patients who complied with the following criteria: (1) carcinoma infiltrating at least the muscularis propria (carcinomas infiltrating only the submucosa, so-called early cancers, were excluded from the study, since none of the 33 patients with such tumors treated by classical radical surgery, demonstrated any signs of local recurrence; (2) only those presenting adenocarcino- (6) surgical treatment comprising low ante rior resection with re-establishment of continuity, or abdominoperi neal excision of the rectum (due to leakage of the anastomosis some days after the first operation, 2 patients with low anterior resection and secondary excision of the rectum were excluded); (7) no prior surgical or radiotherapeutic treatment; (8) en bloc surgery with no rupture of the surgical specimen, and no incision through tumor tis sue; (9) no intraoperative extension of the procedure involving the additional resection of neighboring organs; (10) curative surgery (R classification Rn; (11) no distant métastasés (M0, also no synchro nous curatively removed distart métastases); (12) patients surviving the first 3 months following surgery, and ( 13) tumor status known by Dec. 31 1983 (34 patients were excluded on account of unknown tumor status, which corresponded to 6.4% of the 533 patients who met all the other criteria).…”
Section: Case Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%